Town Square

Post a New Topic

Guest opinion: City moving forward toward a sustainable, healthy future

Original post made on Apr 28, 2019

The Menlo Park City Council unanimously passed a Climate and Sustainability Resolution, setting forth an ambitious, detailed and appropriate framework of policy goals for both city greenhouse gas emissions reduction and natural environment protection.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Saturday, April 27, 2019, 8:07 AM

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Boomer
a resident of Menlo Park: Linfield Oaks
on Apr 28, 2019 at 10:35 am

Thank you, Ray, for continuing to emphasize these vague/symbolic gestures while simultaneously opposing SB50, which might actually make a GHG difference by fundamentally changing our land use/transportation patterns! I mean, on the one hand SB50 is endorsed by the National Resources Defense Council, Environment California, Fossil Free California, and California League of Conservation Voters, but on the other hand it might affect our treasured ~neighborhood character~. So, you know- better keep kicking the can!

7 people like this
Posted by Menlocal
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Apr 28, 2019 at 12:08 pm

Mueller opposes SB50? That is reassuring news.
Thank for sharing another fantastic reason to support him.
Atherton City Councilmember Rick DeGolia wrote an editorial in the Almanac this week also opposing SB50.
Rick helped start Peninsula Clean Energy.

These two local electeds prove you can care about the environment and also have common sense.

@MenloBoomer thanks for sharing your thoughts about our neighborhoods - scary. Yikes.

Like this comment
Posted by Amanda Y
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 30, 2019 at 6:25 pm

If our politicians want to lead useful change they will focus their efforts less on spending scarce resources on very low return efforts like reducing greenhouse gases by using more electricity. Instead they should focus more on preventing catastrophic wildfires and improving the reliance of our very fragile power grid. Extended loss of power or a local wildfire will have a much greater negative impact on our community than the negligible positive impact we can make by reducing GHG. Sure maybe going all electric sounds sexy, but it’s low return. Plus do you really think PG&E’s neglected electric infrastructure can handle an all-electric society by 2013? Not a chance in a million.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Don't be the last to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Natural wine bar Salvaje opens in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,877 views

Cap On? Cap Off? Recycling Bottles is Confusing
By Laura Stec | 41 comments | 1,771 views

Premarital and Couples: "Our Deepest Fear" by Marianne Williamson
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,520 views

Everything you've always wanted to know ...
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 1,078 views

Menlo Park Planning For Civic Projects Needs A Major Reboot. (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 1 comment | 139 views