Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, November 2, 2021, 9:13 PM
Town Square
Woodside voters are closely divided on Measure A, with 'yes' leading by 18 votes on election night
Original post made on Nov 3, 2021
Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, November 2, 2021, 9:13 PM
Comments (4)
a resident of Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Nov 3, 2021 at 7:32 am
Matt is a registered user.
The vote margin increased to 20 after local polling counts were added. I'm of mixed emotions here. Yes, I supported the measure and I'm glad it's looking like it will probably pass. But the real winner of this election is apathy. This was a mail in ballot, with every registered voter receiving a ballot by mail that required no postage to return. Yet only about 40% of the community cared enough to cast a vote. I'm almost 60 and have only missed two elections in my entire life, both primaries, and both when I was much, much younger.
This vote, now with just a 20 vote margin, does show that individual efforts and votes do matter. Yet 60% of the community couldn't be bothered to cast their vote.
a resident of Woodside: other
on Nov 3, 2021 at 8:37 am
KMOFFEN is a registered user.
I share the previous commentator's concern about low turnout of voters for Measure A. Woodsiders should know better, and exercise their right to vote on whatever matters come before them. With mail-in and drop-off ballots, it is so extremely easy to vote. Shame on you, non-voters!!!
a resident of Woodside: other
on Nov 4, 2021 at 5:13 am
pogo is a registered user.
One thing is for certain, the Woodside community is VERY evenly divided on this issue. Assuming this measure eventually passes, our Town Council would be wise to go slowly. There is clearly no ground swell of support for this.
I think there is a lot of support for limited outdoor dining - perhaps not the entire front parking lot, more likely the front spaces facing the restaurants.
But there is very little support for an amphitheater. Had the proponents limited their initiative to outdoor dining only, I suspect support would have been near unanimous.
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Hills
on Nov 4, 2021 at 9:06 am
Woodsider Lifer is a registered user.
This is hardly a mandate to forge ahead with chainsaws and bulldozers. There are many hurdles ahead should this measure ultimately succeed in the final vote tally. The emergency order allowing outdoor dining and the dining itself will inevitably disappear long before any proposal makes it through the long process garnering entitlements and development. One has to wonder whether a few dozen people who voted 'yes' may regret their hasty decision in retrospect.
Once again the phrases hold true, we are a nation divided and a community divided--every vote counts. An apparent happy day for 850 people. A sad day for Woodside. Good luck red-legged frogs and dusky-footed woodrats, owls and squirrels, a bit more of our shared paradise will apparently disappear forever in favor of mediocre coffee and avocado toast.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
Holiday Fun in San Francisco- Take the Walking Tour for An Evening of Sparkle!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,852 views
Pacifica’s first brewery closes its doors
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 2,341 views
Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,796 views
Support local families in need
Your contribution to the Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Almanac readers and foundations contributed over $300,000.