Town Square

Post a New Topic

Measure A opponents spend nearly $4K on yard signs, mailers

Original post made on Nov 8, 2021

Save Rural Woodside put $3,879 into signs, mailers and yard signs to oppose Measure A.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Saturday, November 6, 2021, 8:49 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by matt from the block
a resident of Woodside: Mountain Home Road
on Nov 8, 2021 at 12:30 pm

matt from the block is a registered user.

Ironic (and not surprising) to see that after complaining vociferously about the "corporate money" supporting the "Yes" side, the "No" side actually ended up spending far more.

Woodside might change here and there, but the hypocrisy will never go away!


Posted by Matt
a resident of Woodside: Skywood/Skylonda
on Nov 8, 2021 at 12:39 pm

Matt is a registered user.

This saddens me. The main argument was that we shouldn't take away what the No campaign portrayed as Woodside protected open space from the heart of downtown. What true is that this parcel is private property owned my an individual who supported the change. I wonder what the owner will do with this piece of land if Measure A fails.

Maybe Jerry and the rest of the vocal No campaign should have reached out to the parcel owner. I sure hope the very slender three vote margin for yes holds, and the No crowd doesn't find out the hard way that this wasnt what they said it was. This land near the shopping area isn't, and never was, the property of Woodside or "protected open space".


Posted by Carol Fisch
a resident of another community
on Nov 21, 2021 at 3:50 pm

Carol Fisch is a registered user.

I was a Town Council Member from 1991-1995. Is the property in question what was known as the Matheson Property, adjacent to Town Hall and behind the Village Pub? If so, there was an uproar when it was discovered that the Town had tried to condemn the property with no public notice and had incurred huge legal expenses in doing so. A limited parking assessment district was formed of only the merchants directly surrounding the property to try to fund the effort. Does the current Council know that history... and that and other similar secret actions led to a Grand Jury Investigation?

Just curious!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Almanac Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Curry and reubens: Local Kitchens opens "digital food halls" on the Peninsula
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 3,403 views

Grand pronouncements vs nuts and bolts
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 2,538 views

Dog Greets and Treats
By Laura Stec | 7 comments | 1,803 views