Town Square

Post a New Topic

Everest directors plan to sue Sequoia district

Original post made on May 8, 2009

A court battle appears likely if, as expected, the directors of Everest Public High School, a new charter school that plans to open in September, file suit on Friday, May 8, to force the high school district to amend its offer of facilities.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 11:58 AM

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by Libertarian
a resident of Woodside High School
on May 8, 2009 at 12:43 pm

It's very unfortunate that this situation has come to this. The district's actions with regard to charter schools have been hostile throughout from denying a charter for Everest to setting the school up to fail. The number of applicants to charter schools in the district should send a clear message that there is a desire for an alternative to what the district is offering. It's also clear that the district will waste what precious resources it has to avoid any sort of competition. Frankly, as a taxpayer, I'm not thrilled with the district using it's website as a propaganda vehicle for its position or fighting rather than working with charter schools.
This story does a disservice to the charter school movement by taking a quote off the web to bring up the tired mantra that the school is trying to avoid EPA. Note that charter schools are required to admit students on a lottery basis from the entire district. This includes students from the southernmost part of EPA to as far north as Belmont. A central location (e.g. Redwood City) allows the best access to the entire district and a location near public transit might be nice too. Note that the district's offices are at Sequoia which also happens to be centrally located in RWC. Where I grew up (Midwest), there was one public high school for the city and, surprise, it was centrally located. For the district to purchase land in about the least central location and build a campus there (without food facilities) and call it a reasonable facility is laughable.
A simple test for the district is whether they would be willing to operate any of their facilities (administrative offices, classes, etc.) in the proposed new facility. If so, then do a lottery to determine who goes where. It is my very strong guess that the district would never consider that because the Proposed "facility" does not pass the sniff test.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 4,018 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,281 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 904 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 320 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 280 views