Town Square

Post a New Topic

Atherton resident calls for probe of police department

Original post made on Feb 2, 2010

An Atherton resident who said he was wrongfully arrested in 2008 on domestic violence charges was exonerated Jan. 14 by a San Mateo County Superior Court judge. Now, he's publicly calling for an investigation into the Atherton Police Department's practices.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 12:00 AM

Comments (12)

Like this comment
Posted by Mohamed Said
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 2, 2010 at 7:17 pm

This must have happened at night. You never see then during the day patrolling. Just at night, during their round-a-bouts on ECR.

Like this comment
Posted by Ed
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 3, 2010 at 12:59 am

Mr.Hines - No one is litigating their case on your forum
The case was litigated before a judge
This paper is a place to report facts
This forum is a place to discuss issues that effect the community
If anyone pulls a Bothum on you--your posters will come to your rescue
We all promise

Like this comment
Posted by Bizarre
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 3, 2010 at 1:39 am

Ed, couldn't have said it better. Picking up on Mr. Hine's comment on the sister thread, what is Town Square for? You write an article about a guy and he makes one very factual comment and you lock down the item? It seemed to me that he had a right to do that since the original article had that allegation yet you then deleted items referring to it (police report tampering or alteration) saying it was unfounded. It seemed like you challenged his credibility and he should have the right to respond to that challenge.

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Feb 3, 2010 at 6:36 am

Another place to report the facts about Atherton.

San Mateo Daily Journal Community Forum

I have been posting there for several years about very serious subjects. At one time they did shut the entire site down (40 days) and deleted all of my articles/posts. Things have changed for the better and I recommend that site.

A recent example you will see: Stogner trys, I am so thankful that I spotted this post and moved it when I did.

Like this comment
Posted by unanswered questions
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 3, 2010 at 8:03 am

Mr. Hine:

You locked the other post before we received a reply from Ms. Gemmet to the question posed by Amateur Editor.

As was accurately recounted by Amateur Editor, an Atherton Police officer who shall remain nameless testified in open court that his police report has been altered.

This is not the first time that a police report being altered in recent memory. Officer Clark Yee was prosecuted by Mr. Wagstaffe on the very same grounds. Hence it stands to reason that Mr. Wagstaffe would seek justice in Mr. Buckheit\'s matter as well. (Please pardon the digression.)

Ms. Gemmet referred to Mr. Buckheit\'s allegation as just that, an allegation. Ms. Gemmet failed to acknowledge that Mr. Buckheit did not make an allegation. Mr. Buckheit made a statement of fact which are documented in court transcripts.

Ms. Gemmet also quoted Mr. Wagstaffe in paraprashing the comments of Judge Forcum. It appears as though Ms. Gemmet was not curious enought to inquire as to whether Mr. Wagstaffe was in the courtroom (he was not) or whether he read the transcript.

I respectfully submit that lazy journalism is shoddy journalism. I respectfully submit to you that we, the readers of your paper deserve an explanation from Ms. Gemmet.

I await your reply Mr. Hine should Ms. Gemmet be to shy to speak for herself.

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Feb 4, 2010 at 8:23 pm

For those Atherton residents serious about your Town.

Mr. Jon Buckheit has been very straight forward to the Council, City Manager, and Police Chief about what he expected to happen by tomorrow. It is unfortunate for all of you that your Police Chief is unwilling to identify the officer or officers who committed a Felony against him. Lets think how hard could this be you only have 12 officers, you subtract the original officer who testified a crime had been committed that leaves 11 including the Chief.

If he can't solve that crime I think that says it all.

Like this comment
Posted by bemused
a resident of Atherton: Lloyden Park
on Feb 4, 2010 at 9:48 pm

Atherton has two detectives. One is a computer expert. Between the two of them they should be able to figure out who dunnit.

Like this comment
Posted by crime novel,
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 4, 2010 at 10:54 pm

One for sure or both detectives were involved from the beginning and both by now.
Expect them to round up the usual suspects -- it has worked before

Like this comment
Posted by Candle Lighter
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Feb 5, 2010 at 12:14 am

It is a clear conflict of interest for the Atherton Police or San Mateo District Attorney to investigate this police report tampering incident. It's simply equivalent to asking the fox if the henhouse is okay. Watergate started with some relatively stupid petty crimes and turned into a national scandal of historical proportions through the cover-up that ensued. I expect this incident to turn into a similarly-scaled scandal for Atherton for the same reasons. Pres. John F. Kennedy was found of stating "a mistake doesn't become a problem until you fail to correct it."

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G. Stogner
a resident of another community
on Feb 5, 2010 at 5:24 am


Thomas Casey III, Counsel for San Mateo County, said yesterday that Attorney General Bill Lockyer’s office found that the allegations made by Ramona Gatto against District Attorney Jim Fox and Assistant District Attorney Morley Pitt were without basis.
"He said the attorney general’s finding underscores the fact that police reports are not confidential documents,"

Web Link

source:November 26, 2002, 12:00 AM SMDJ

Like this comment
Posted by deep throat
a resident of Atherton: other
on Feb 5, 2010 at 7:33 am

Candle lighter is right.

The scandal that is smoldering now will soon be something big. I have inside knowledge that Jon Buckheit isn\'t the only recent victim of evidence tampering by the Atherton Police Department.

As was the case with Watergate, the chief executive of the PD will be answering the question \"what did you know and when did you know it?\"

Like this comment
Posted by Candle Lighter
a resident of Atherton: West Atherton
on Feb 6, 2010 at 11:36 pm

Interesting story out of the Mercury News: San Jose detective faces criminal probe over police work

Web Link

"Matty Hrncir, who once worked as a detective in the elite Sexual Assaults Investigations Unit, could face criminal charges in a highly unusual probe that potentially implicates the officer, a nine-year veteran, of a felony charge of filing false police reports, according to her lawyer, Terry Bowman."

"Assistant Police Chief Daniel Katz on Friday confirmed that San Jose investigators delivered the case to the district attorney's office earlier this month for possible prosecution."

"Police departments have a responsibility to clean up their own house, and if they feel there is a problem with an officer, they should investigate it thoroughly," said William Rapoport, a veteran San Mateo County lawyer who specializes in law enforcement. "If the case has merit, submitting it for prosecution is beneficial to the department and the community at-large and to the judicial system.''

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 4,356 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 980 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 472 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 413 views