Town Square

Post a New Topic

Sequoia Healthcare District continues to collect property tax

Original post made by Jack Hickey, Woodside: Emerald Hills, on Mar 4, 2013

___In the 1996 Measure "H" election Web Link in which the Sequoia Hospital District obtained voter approval for the sale of Sequoia Hospital, election materials failed to disclose the fact that property taxes, originally assessed pursuant to the 1946 election Web Link which established the District, would continue to be collected.
___The voter intent of that 1946 election was to create a Hospital District, with authority to assess taxes, which would oversee the construction, operation and maintenance of Sequoia Hospital. It was expected that the hospital would become self supporting, and that continued tax assessments would become unecessary. History shows that after 67 years, taxation continues. It will also show that Sequoia Hospital, under the stewardship of CEO Art Faro, was operating in the red to the tune of $29 Million at the time of the 1996 sale. Web Link
___The District, which has morphed into the Sequoia Healthcare District, is now engaged in philanthropic activities never intended by voters in 1946. Two San Mateo County Civil Grand Juries (2001-2002) have exposed this situation.
___The Sequoia Healthcare District's continued collection of property taxes appears to be based upon a "Tax Revenues" agreement buried in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Web Link referenced in the election documents, which states:

___"District shall on an ongoing basis retain one hundred percent (100%) of its Tax Revenues, and shall utilize those funds, net of District's operating expenses, in furtherance of its purposes as a California hospital district (District Purposes"), through:
a. Programs and other activities provided or operated by Corporation and approved by District;
b. Programs and other activities provided or operated by other parties and approved by District; or,
c. Programs and other activities provided or operated by District;
provided, however, that no such programs or other activities funded by District's Tax Revenues shall be programs or other activities that duplicate the programs, activities or services of the Hospital."
It should be obvious that the decision for such retention of Tax Revenues by the District should be made by voters, and should have been made clear in the primary election material.

In the following year, a revisionist History of Sequoia Healthcare District was created with guidance from former Sequoia Hospital CEO Art Faro. Web Link

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by Jack Hickey
a resident of Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Apr 11, 2013 at 2:14 pm

Here's the missing web Link. In the following year, a revisionist History of Sequoia Healthcare District was created with guidance from former Sequoia Hospital CEO Art Faro. Web Link

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 2,088 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,075 views


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.