Town Square

Post a New Topic

Attorney scrutinizes Menlo hotel parking approval

Original post made on Apr 4, 2013

The Menlo Park council voted 4-0 last week in favor of a proposed hotel on Glenwood Avenue, but that won't be the last time the public hears about the issue.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 4, 2013, 8:19 AM

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of another community
on Apr 4, 2013 at 12:03 pm

It'll be interesting to see where this goes, since the leadership failed.

Like this comment
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 4, 2013 at 12:41 pm

I think other, future businesses in the 1300 block of El Camino which awaits development might have an interest in Garwood remaining public parking. What will the developers of other properties persuade MP to throw in as freebies?

MP spent time & money (for consultants) to develop the Specific Plan. Now, developer Moulds & senior planner Rogers seek to ignore that. Does MP pay Rogers a salary? His disregard for of regulations adopted specifically to benefit & protect MP & its residents is both arrogant & cavalier.

Like this comment
Posted by Gov't out of control
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Apr 4, 2013 at 1:19 pm

Dear Editor:

How many residents could be accommodated in the Casa Peninsula?

I know if it still does, but the Holiday Inn on ECR in RWC closest to MP was used by the county to house people released from jail. Are other hotels in MP already doing this?

Will the Marriott Residence Inn be doing that as well? Is permission from the City Council needed for that?

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Apr 4, 2013 at 1:42 pm

Thank you Mr. Hashian for pursuing this. I will gladly join you as a plaintiff.
What the council did us either an illegal gift of public property and/or an illegal discount on the voter approved transient occupant tax rate. In addition it ignores the current zoning ordinance as embodied in the Specific Plan. Treating the Specific Plan as a sandbox is a dangerous public policy.

Like this comment
Posted by bye bye
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 4, 2013 at 7:46 pm

I expect that Thomas Rogers will soon depart for a job with a developer or Stanford. It will be a great day for Menlo Park.

Like this comment
Posted by Morris Brown
a resident of Menlo Park: Park Forest
on Apr 5, 2013 at 2:37 am

When we were involved in negotiations with the O'Brien group on the Derry project a few years ago, as part of the Derry Referendum, O'Brien was asking for the use of a few "on street" parking spots to meet the development's parking requirements.

City Attorney McClure was present and he was asked if the the City had ever allowed the use of "on street" parking to meet a development's parking requirements.

His answer was NO, this had never been done. That killed off O'Brien's request.

Clearly what has happened here is a new "give away" and will without a doubt be requested by other developers.

The City has almost unlimited power with issues involving land use decisions and I seriously doubt this action, disgusting as it is, is illegal.

What the citizens of Menlo Park should be concerned about is, why this Council is going along with this action. To my way of thinking, what we have here is a council being a "puppet" of the development community at the expense of its citizens.

Morris Brown
Stone Pine Lane

Like this comment
Posted by whatever
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Apr 5, 2013 at 12:41 pm

Simple solutions.

The city should require the hotel to purchase the Garwood portion land at market price and build a 138 space parking structure on that portion, large enough to cover their 99 additionally required off street parking spaces plus 39 public spaces to replace the lost public street parking.

Or they could always excavate under the current building for the additionally need 99 spaces. Very costly, but not impossible.

Like this comment
Posted by Garwood Parking
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 5, 2013 at 7:05 pm

What about the parking on Garwood that runs all along the Caltrain line from Glendale to Encinal? Are those spots deeded to the apartment complexes across the street? If not, why are they not subject to the same parking restrictions as the rest of the city? Those spots are always filled overnight. Does anyone know?

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Apr 5, 2013 at 9:10 pm


areas around apartment complexes allow overnight parking with a permit. Nothing new there.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 10 comments | 2,323 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,261 views


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.