Town Square

Post a New Topic

Woodside nixes solar-panel plan

Original post made on Sep 22, 2010

The Woodside Town Council voted unanimously on Sept. 14 to do as a staff report recommended: scrap the plans for solar panels on Town Hall because it would not be a cost-effective investment.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 10:29 AM

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 22, 2010 at 12:33 pm

"Solar panels, while a great idea, don't pencil out financially, "

Huh?

Makes me wonder, why do newly built gas stations have panels on top of them? The extraction industry understands the need to take advantage of the sun, why can't Woodside make the numbers work?

'tis a riddle...


Like this comment
Posted by Anonymous-Woodside Mom
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Glens
on Sep 22, 2010 at 1:27 pm

I put solar on my roof about 5 years ago, and it's now paid for itself. AND I don't have an electricity bill anymore. I've only had to do one repair, and it was covered under warrantee. Are we sure that someone did proper research?


Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 22, 2010 at 1:36 pm

Woodside Mom:

I'm betting you got some subsidies when you put your panels on, no? Many of those programs have gone away. Also a commercial installation is a different animal from residential.


Like this comment
Posted by David Boyce
Almanac staff writer
on Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 pm

David Boyce is a registered user.

Another factor: As a non-tax-paying entity, the town of Woodside is not eligible for incentives in the same way that private citizens or corporations are, according to town staff.


Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Woodside: other
on Sep 22, 2010 at 4:27 pm

Thanks for the points.

That still doesn't jibe with what we see out here. There's a number of high schools in San Jose that have covered their parking lots with panels, like Andrew Hill.

They don't get tax breaks, do they?

Again: I have to wonder who wielded the pencil in these calculations, if schools, gas stations and so many others make it profitable.


Like this comment
Posted by panel owner
a resident of Portola Valley: Ladera
on Sep 22, 2010 at 6:36 pm

OK, what about all the companies that will install the panels and "lease" them to you or less than the cost of the electricity you would be buying??

Oil companies have bought into panels. They are buying up the companies that produce them. They won't be giving up control of our energy any time soon.

Find a local CALIFORNIA company and find a way to make the numbers work. A good part of the cost goes into paying a wage to a CALIFORNIAN and not just wasted energy.

Sure... they should also be more efficient!


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 3, 2017 at 12:24 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 3, 2017 at 7:21 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Menlo Park: Suburban Park/Lorelei Manor/Flood Park Triangle

on Jun 6, 2017 at 3:04 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Nobu Palo Alto eyes next-door expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 3,689 views

The Comp Plan EIR--Pluses and Minuses
By Steve Levy | 11 comments | 762 views

Couples: Cultivate Love, Gottman Style
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 721 views

It's contagious
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 390 views