Town Square

Post a New Topic

Arrested employees worked in DA's office

Original post made on Jul 8, 2012

Two former San Mateo County employees, recently arrested on charges of stealing from the estates of deceased people, actually worked in the office charged with prosecuting crimes -- the district attorney's office -- when the alleged crimes took place.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, July 3, 2012, 11:00 AM

Comments (4)

Like this comment
Posted by Lurker
a resident of another community
on Jul 8, 2012 at 7:13 am

If their supervisor reported "directly " to the DA's office, as this article states, then why did Wagstaffe tell a Mercury News reporter the following:

Web Link

Wagstaffe said the district attorney's office itself didn't have anything to do with the Public Administrator program, but he plans to investigate how the alleged crimes occurred.


Can the Almanac clear up his conflicting statements?

Like this comment
Posted by Michael G Stogner
a resident of another community
on Jul 8, 2012 at 10:30 am

This was predictable, the Board of Supervisors have been notified and warned for at least 10 years about the corruption at the highest level of the District Attorneys Office. I personally have been with three citizens who spoke about this subject to the board on this subject over the years.

Lurker, brings up an excellent point, and it is pretty simple to understand. Steve Wagstaffe didn't tell the truth to the reporter, The Supervisors couldn't care less.

Wagstaffe said the district attorney's office itself didn't have anything to do with the Public Administrator program,

A murder conviction case was reversed because of Mr. Wagstaffe's personal behavior, here is what one of three Judges said about him.

Hon. Judge Marsha Berzon " The prosecutor's (Steve Wagstaffe) asserted concern about objectivity was not an actual reason for his decision to strike (the juror), but was pretext,"

a reason given in justification of a course of action that is not the real reason....

Most of us ordinary citizens would consider pretext and lie to be the same.

Like this comment
Posted by GOLLY
a resident of another community
on Jul 11, 2012 at 4:45 pm

That means a member or members on the Board of Supervisors could have been involved in nefarious doings.
This has long been the view or rumored officials who were in the "pockets" of big business and particularly of property brokers.
Some have moved on to even higher offices not expecting the collapse of Wall St.
One name along with some of his cronies (yes, a rumored male Supervisor)and his department employees who all looked the other way and are no longer visible like they were.
How can anyone in this day, not be a possible corrupt politico?
The IRS is not downsizing its investigators for the Silicon Valley and its environs.

Like this comment
Posted by Menlo Voter
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Jul 11, 2012 at 7:19 pm

GOLLY = R Gordon

Mr Gordon:

why don't you just post under your usual nom de plume? We all know it's you.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 10 comments | 2,310 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,251 views


Readers' Choice ballot is here

It’s time to decide what local business is worthy of the title “Almanac Readers' Choice” — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 19th issue of The Almanac.