Town Square

Update: Fire prompts four-alarm response

Original post made on Mar 17, 2009

Firefighters are at the scene a four-alarm fire at 1050 University Drive at Santa Cruz Avenue in downtown Menlo Park, across the street from Fremont Park. The building where the fire occurred has several businesses, including Peet's Coffee & Tea and the Calla boutique. The fire appeared contained by mid-morning.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 8:08 AM


Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 17, 2009 at 3:23 pm

Hopefully all the other merchants on Santa Cruz who occupy buildings built years ago will realize that investing in improved fire detection and suppression equipment may be a very prudent thing to do rather than suffer the extended loss of use that will occur from a fire like this one. Thanks to the Fire District this fire was confined to a single building - it could easily have taken out a whole block of businesses.

It is short sighted to do only what the very outmoded City of Menlo Park regulations require. If you are willing to pay for fire insurance then you should be willing to make a similar investment in fire prevention.

Like this comment
Posted by Wendy
a resident of Woodside: Woodside Hills
on Mar 18, 2009 at 8:47 am

[portion deleted] ... this fire brought out the best in those who fought it and are working to recover from it. The calm resolve and professionalism of a well-run fire scene was a thing of beauty to behold. The firefighters hand-carried breakables from the Calla boutique as if they were rescuing items from their own homes. They repeatedly inquired if they could fetch anything special from the ruined interiors, photos or other items we wanted. They were unfailingly kind and communicated clearly to those of us who needed information. Friends in the neighborhood helped carry items from was all in the spirit of compassion and helping others. All this warmed my heart, among many others.

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 18, 2009 at 2:25 pm

[portion deleted]
These postings would much better serve the community if we went back to the subject of the original article - a very unfortunate, probably preventable fire which was superbly responded to by the Fire District and its mutual response partners. The object lesson is that we can and should prevent these types of fires in older buildings which do not have proper fire alarms and fire suppression systems.

Like this comment
Posted by Thanks Peter
a resident of Menlo Park: Menlo Oaks
on Mar 18, 2009 at 3:45 pm

Peter, thank you very much for your service and work for our community. [Portion deleted. Several comments in this thread were removed because they were off-topic.]

Like this comment
Posted by Linda Griffin
a resident of Atherton: other
on Mar 18, 2009 at 7:45 pm

I have a question for Peter Carpenter. I can see that better fire detection methods could have alerted the fire department sooner but what kind of fire suppression systems can get at fires that are contained behind walls and between floors?

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton: Lindenwood
on Mar 18, 2009 at 11:07 pm

Very good question.

The origin of the fire appears, but it is not yet proven, to have been an equipment closet that would have had a sprinkler head in it if sprinklers were installed. The fire then apparently spread from that room through the electrical and ventilation chases to the inside of the walls and between the floor joists.

In my opinion, a sprinkler system would have extinguished the fire, and also sounded a proper fire alarm, before the fire had a chance to spread. Engine 6 would have responded in less than three minutes and the sprinkler system would have been shut off. There would have been zero damage to the rest of the structure and no smoke damage to the businesses in the building. When the building is repaired it will, ironically, be required to have fire sprinklers.