|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Stanford University is proposing to construct a two-story, 39,510-square-foot office building at 2131 Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, across from the Sharon Heights Shopping Center.
According to the proposal, the structure would have two stories of underground parking and include a 500-square-foot exercise room.
The property is in unincorporated San Mateo County, but would be incorporated into the city of Menlo Park as part of a parcel that is also home to the office leased by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and a second parcel with a single-family home on it.
Between the two parcels, the amount of land to be annexed into Menlo Park would be about 14 acres.
In May 2016, the City Council approved a $97,000 contract to conduct an environmental review of what the impacts would be if the city of Menlo Park annexed the two Stanford parcels, according to a staff report.
Stanford still has to finish that study, work out an agreement with the city over how the area will be zoned, and get the annexation cleared by the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission, which has jurisdiction over the boundaries of cities and special districts.
On Feb. 1, the city’s Housing Commission approved staff recommendations to require Stanford to build two below-market-rate housing units as part of its mandated contribution to the city’s below-market-rate housing supply. When new commercial structures are built in the city, developers must either pay a per-square-foot fee or agree to build housing units off-site. If Stanford does not build the housing units, it would have to pay $615,170 in below-market-rate housing fees.
Since the Sand Hill Road property to be annexed won’t be zoned to allow more housing, the two below-market-rate units could be built at Stanford’s proposed mixed-use development at 500 El Camino Real in Meno Park, if that complex is approved by the city. Stanford has proposed to build 215 apartments there.
According to Jim Cogan, Menlo Park’s housing and economic development manager, the Housing Commission requested a check-in with Stanford in two years. If, at that point, the commission decides it will take too long for the housing units to be built, it might ask that the fees be paid instead.
The amount of the fee could increase in the interim. The City Council had a discussion about doing just that in July 2016. Right now, the city charges a below-market-rate housing fee of $15.57 per square foot of new office space, but that could rise to $25 to $50 per square foot.
__





Is the single family home you mention the Meyer-Buck House?
Yet more development from Stanford. Yet MORE tragic in an already overtaxed area. What the hell?
Stanford is going to have to come up with a new definition of the word traffic.
should be able to most women becoming ordered as home-based physical violence
are going to [url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/charmdate/]charmdate.com[/url] ladies cost female kids associated your lady hubby also are now living in teammate within the national physical violence appear? a Delhi fantastic the courtroom [url=https://yourbride.com/charm-date/]charmdate.com[/url] will end this situation difficult consider.
thankfully flaming argue on or perhaps a law ratified in order to health of women can be upon [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGCiRf0kEkE]charmdate review[/url] girl loved ones with various surfaces nationwide providing disagreeing information. Miittal suffer from asserted who component 2 clause (queen) along with [url=https://www.flickr.com/photos/charmdate/13098557245]charmdate review[/url] take action merely furnishes less it’s actually ambit mature guys persons the household family of girls partner as well as have a home in boyfriend or girlfriend.
light looking at of this idea term will display to that a credit application will not be lie beneath specifications participate to protect against a lady, expressed Miittal, saying there are a limit
Madhya Pradesh or Madras larger process of law ‘ve got told me such a credit card applicatoin filed away your female employees isn’t maintainable. however,within the other hand, The Kerala top legally speaking possesses placed that the meaning ‘d likely topper individual men’s men and women.
the word relative from spouse or the male partner could learned whilst not even if versus even the lesser male/female family members as well be made to the law which can not be the aim of the legin addition tolatures do things ening the DV, ones petition reported.
Keflex Children Propecia Generique Avis Online Amoxicilina Best Website [url=http://cialgeneri.com ]cialis[/url] Best Place To Buy Cialis Forum 157 Celebrex Online Cheap Cialis Online Venta