Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

View thumbnails of all photos Click on pictures to enlarge.

By Dave Boyce

A Sharon Heights fire Thursday night destroyed two townhouses and caused major damage to a third, according to Chief Harold Schapelhouman of the Menlo Park Fire Protection District.

He estimated the loss at 15 Susan Gale Court, where the three townhouses are in one structure, at between $1 million and $1.5 million.

Firefighters battled the five-alarm fire for about two hours Thursday night.

The fire, reported at 5:11 p.m., was contained by around 7:15 p.m.

More than 50 firefighters, including crews from Redwood City, Woodside, Palo Alto and San Mateo, as well as Menlo Park, fought the blaze. A total of 17 engines, five ladder trucks and two breathing units were involved, supervised by six battalion chiefs.

The fire started in the middle unit of the structure, said Chief Schapelhouman. The fire spread through the walls from the center of the middle unit, and got in between the first and second floors of the middle unit, he said.

One firefighter was injured slightly, with a minor burn to his ear, the chief said.

A helicopter from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or Cal Fire, in Los Gatos, equipped with water, flew over the area, looking for ember fires.

When you get an air unit, “for the fire district, that’s a big fire,” Chief Shapelhouman said.

Smoke could be seen for miles around. He said they were really lucky there was no wind.

When he arrived at the scene, he said, the fire was already well along, with the back walls of all three units already engulfed “from attic to patio.”

The townhouses range in size from 2,500 to 2,700 square feet, he said. The two on the ends are three levels, and the one in the middle is four levels.

Firefighters streamed water from fire hoses from the front, back and side of the burning structure to prevent the spread of embers. “A lot of water is going on this thing,” an observer said.

Around 5:30 p.m., witnesses reported seeing big flames shooting out of the roof, and heavy gray smoke rising out of the eaves. “This is a bad one,” said an observer. “It looks like the whole roof is going up.”

Some time after smoke began pouring out of the eaves, everybody was ordered off the roof. “We went defensive and pulled all crews out to fight the fire from the outside,” Chief Schapelhouman said.

“At some point, you’ve got to say ‘Uncle,’ and that’s what we did,” he said. “We said ‘Uncle.’ It was a great effort by everybody.”

Flying embers did cause spot fires on the roof of the house next door, but these were put out, the chief said. The same effect ignited a tree, but it was never a significant threat, he said.

A neighbor was seen hosing down his hedges and the roof of his house, but his house was not in the direction that the wind was blowing.

All the homes in the circle have wood shake roofs that are more than 20 years old, Fire Inspector Ron Keefer of the Menlo Park Fire Protection District said in an interview.

One of the three townhouses in the fire was equipped with a sprinkler system, but it didn’t go off as it should have, Chief Schapelhouman said. Sprinklers are essential elements in Menlo Park homes, he said.

When the fire is contained and the situation is under control, firefighters will go in with thermal imaging cameras to look for latent fires, the fire inspector said in an interview.

In a blaze like this one, it’s common for firefighters to be stationed on the scene all night to ensure the fire does not restart.

With five alarms, there were enough firefighters to fight the blaze in shifts. The fire also involved six battalion chiefs, with each one being responsible for a particular sector of the fire, Mr. Keefer said.

The battalion chiefs monitor the stamina of their crews and replace them with fresh crews from the staging area as necessary, Mr. Keefer said.

  • 3422_full-1
  • 3424_full-1
  • 3425_full-1
  • 3426_full-1
  • 3427_full-1
  • 3428_full-1
  • 3429_full-1
  • 3440_full-1
  • 3441_full-1

Most Popular

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. Thanks for the quick post on your site. I’m hearing all the sirens and helicopters around here, so it was good to find out what was going on…

  2. Thank you very–very much for posting this very important news item.
    Now on to another very important side of this fire story.

    Alright when–when–when will these very dangerous shake roofs be finally REMOVED from the ENTIRE state of California???
    How many more of these very SCARY firestorms will it take before the California Legislature wakes up and protects the public by doing its job??
    The “Freeway Complex Fire” of Nov 2008 out of Socal really SCACRED the daylights out of me. I really–really do NOT want to see a similar event like that up here in the SF Bay Area.

  3. This rapid reporting is great, allowing us to monitor the situation without contributing to traffic problems.

    By the way, the shake roofs of all 77 townhouses in the Sharon Hills complex are now in being replaced. Susan Gale Court is among the last of the scheduled sections, with work planned to start later in July.

  4. Shake roofs have been around sharon heights homes probably going as far back as when sharon height was developed in the early 60’s. So I don’t think they will be leaving any time soon. Maybe after today new homes will be built with something else rather then shingles. Probably not. Usually takes a hard lesson like a house fire for some people to get with the program.

  5. Lets hope all residents had sufficient insurance and have found a place to stay until that is sorted out.

    A shake roof did not cause this fire and did not cause it to go out of control according to everything that has been reported here and on ABC news so far.

    It is not the job of the California Legislature to determine what people build their homes out of. Leave that to the insurance companies.

  6. I’m so sorry for the people who lost their homes and belongings. I’d like to help by donating clothing and other items they might need. Suggestions?

  7. In defense of wood shake roofing: Fire retardant wood shakes can be less burnable than
    composition roofing. I have tried burning fire retardant wood shakes in an outdoor fire pit and could not get them to ignite. I viewed the house that burned this morning and talked to
    a firefighter. I observed and he agreed, the shakes did not play a big part in the fire. Non
    retardant wood of any kind is another story, of course.

  8. I am very grateful for the outcome and the work of the fire fighters. It concerns me though that one of the respondents stated, in effect, that the fire fighters deserve the raise they want because of this. So, when a public servant does his/her job they “deserve” an 11% raise? I don’t get a raise whenever I do my job well. In fact, many of us in the private sector are getting salary and benefit cuts while working harder than ever before.

  9. Jake asked “where is Peter Carpenter?”
    Here is my posting on this fire and the response:

    Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of the Atherton: Lindenwood neighborhood, 22 hours ago

    I have just returned from the five alarm fire in Sharon Heights – I think we can all be very proud of the professional response by more than five different fire agencies to this incident. Given the wood shake roofs this could easily have taken out the whole neighborhood had there been higher temperatures and winds.

    Hats off to a job well done by all concerned.

    **********************
    I would add that our firefighters did a great job – the job they were hired for, the job they were trained for and the job that they are paid for. It is a well respected saving amongst those of us who have been professional firefighters (I was a Smokejumper as well as a volunteer firefighter) that the biggest risk we take is the day we take our oath of office and thereafter we are simply (big understatement) doing the job we vowed to do.

Leave a comment