News

State board reviews appeal by Menlo Park residents to transfer school districts

 
A map of the households seeking to transfer into the Menlo Park City School District from the Ravenswood City School District. (Map courtesy California State Board of Education.)

For the second time in the past 25 years, the California State Board of Education is deciding the fate of an appeal to transfer 31 households from the Ravenswood City School District into the Menlo Park City School District.

The board was scheduled to hold a public hearing on the matter starting around 10:30 a.m. today (Sept. 6). Access the live stream here.

Representatives of those 31 households, located along the north side of O'Connor Street in the Willows neighborhood and making up the Menlo Park-East Palo Alto border, petitioned in 1992 for their properties to be added to the Menlo Park City School District. The San Mateo County Committee on School District Organization, which is responsible for deciding district boundaries, denied the petition. The petitioners appealed the denial to the state Board of Education, which upheld the county committee's decision.

In December 2014, three residents — Susan Stacy Keller, John Barksdale and Lansing Scriven — created a new petition, gathering signatures and submitting them to the county's education department, requesting that the properties from 235 to 295 O'Connor St. be moved into the Menlo Park district from the Ravenswood district. The county Committee on School District Organization voted unanimously to deny the territory transfer.

The county committee unanimously denied the new petition; its members determined that the petition did not meet three of nine requirement thresholds: that a transfer between districts not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation; not increase school facility costs; and not cause a "substantial negative effect" on the finances of the affected districts.

The petitioners then appealed the committee's decision to the state.

According to a report by the state Board of Education, the state Department of Education did a separate assessment of the situation. The report says the department disagrees with the county's findings that the thresholds were not met, but cites other concerns that led to a recommendation that the state education board deny the appeal.

"These concerns include the racial isolation of students in the Ravenswood (school district) and that district's ongoing fiscal problems," according to the report's authors.

The state's grounds for disagreement with the county's findings are mainly based on the fact that the area that would be transferred includes few children and not much territory.

Ravenswood district Superintendent Gloria Hernandez Goff told The Almanac that previous transfers of territory out of the Ravenswood district have "severely impacted the fiscal health of the district."

As the district has gotten smaller, she said, it's become a "little hub of poverty in the midst of Silicon Valley."

Even if none of the households on O'Connor Street sends kids to the Ravenswood district, she noted, having the Menlo Park homes located in the Ravenswood district boosts the district's assessed property values, since those values in Menlo Park tend to be higher than those in East Palo Alto.

Having higher assessed values boosts the district's bonding capacity, which makes possible higher levels of funding from bond measures to finance projects such as improving school facilities.

According to the state's report, the bonding capacity per enrolled student in the Ravenswood district is about $11,233, whereas in the Menlo Park district, it's $54,416, nearly five times greater.

Because there are more existing parcel taxes in Menlo Park, the transfer would result in losses to the Ravenswood district of about $6,000 annually, while the Menlo Park district would gain about $25,000 annually. Even with the increases, because the Menlo Park district is funded through property taxes alone, it's not expected that the costs to educate new students from that area would be covered.

The proposed transfer would also go against the "spirit" of the 1979 court ruling that led to the creation of the Tinsley voluntary transfer program, the report's authors assert. That program allows minority Ravenswood students to transfer out of the district to attend other local school districts. The court ruling included a settlement order with goals to "further equal educational opportunities" and reduce "minority racial isolation among or between the students of the respondent districts' elementary schools."

"The promotion of diversity was supposed to be a two-way street," Hernandez Goff said. However, she added, the reality is anything but. About 1,200 students leave the Ravenswood district to attend schools in other districts, she said. No students transfer into the Ravenswood district.

"If you look at the Tinsley students, they are all Ravenswood students."

The authors also include, among other reasons in their recommendation to deny the appeal, the fact that approving the appeal could result in encouraging larger portions of Menlo Park to seek transfer into the Menlo Park district – which would have more substantial impacts to the Ravenswood district. The Belle Haven neighborhood of Menlo Park has recently also expressed interest in, and circulated a petition in favor of, leaving the Ravenswood district.

Access the state Board of Education's agenda here.

--

Sign up for Almanac Express to get news updates. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Comments

78 people like this
Posted by Downtowner
a resident of Menlo Park: Central Menlo Park
on Sep 6, 2018 at 12:34 pm

The real reason the O'Connor residents want this is to boost their own property values by a few hundred thousand dollars.


8 people like this
Posted by Brian
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Sep 6, 2018 at 3:08 pm

Brian is a registered user.

I am sure they want to boost the property values but anyone who has kids would never want to willingly send them to Ravenswood School District (I went to Willow School). The quality of education is deplorable, just look at the state ratings. The district is mismanaged and the residents in the district don't seem to recognize this fact or just don't care enough to get rid of the current school board and demand change.


There is no need to go into details here since there have been many articles and discussions on the Ravenswood School District and the questionable behavior of the staff and board.


108 people like this
Posted by Bob S
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Sep 6, 2018 at 8:21 pm

The real reason is that parents would potentially save $20-30,000+ per year by sending their kids to Menlo Park schools vs private schools.


3 people like this
Posted by Brian
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Sep 6, 2018 at 8:25 pm

Brian is a registered user.

Bob, let's face it, about the only choice you have if you live in the Ravenswood district is to send your child to private school. Most families don't have that choice because they can't afford it so their kids get a sub-par education which handicaps them for the rest of their life...


19 people like this
Posted by Lloyden Park
a resident of Atherton: Lloyden Park
on Sep 7, 2018 at 9:02 am

"The authors also include...the fact that approving the appeal could result in encouraging larger portions of Menlo Park to seek transfer into the Menlo Park district – which would have more substantial impacts to the Ravenswood district. The Belle Haven neighborhood [is petitioning] leaving the Ravenswood district."

Not just Belle Haven.

Lloyden Park is watching this as well. Lloyden Park families can make effectively the same claims as O'Connor.

If the O'Connor transfer is approved, we will be petitioning as well.

We have the right to send our kids to good public schools too!!!


1 person likes this
Posted by Brian
a resident of Menlo Park: The Willows
on Sep 7, 2018 at 10:47 am

Brian is a registered user.

Lloyden Park,

It is a little different in that Selby Lane school has a CSR rank of 5 and Willow Oaks has a rank of 1 (out of 10). I am sure that if everyone got their wish they would be in the Menlo Park or Las Lomitas district as it would bump up their property values buy a huge amount. But you know when you bought in that neighborhood what district it was in and could have looked up the rank of the schools, right? Also, what happens to the schools and districts that they leave?

I feel for the families that have kids going to Ravenswood schools, I don't know if I support them transferring to Menlo Park schools but I understand. If things had changed drastically in the last few years I would probably be more open to supporting the move, but the Ravenswood Schools have been very bad for probably 45+ years. I know they were pretty bad when I attended (Teachers getting the exams early and having students memorize what boxes to check like A, C, D, B, B, etc. instead of teaching the material). So I have to believe that people who purchased in this area know what they were buying into and chose to accept that they would have bad schools or have to send their kids to private schools.

I guess we wait and see what happens to the appeal, but it does not sound promising based on the information in this article.


Like this comment
Posted by Lloyden Park
a resident of Atherton: Lloyden Park
on Sep 7, 2018 at 12:07 pm

"Board of Education's agenda"

According to the agenda, this transfer was discussed yesterday (Thu).

What was the result?


"It is a little different in that Selby Lane school has a CSR rank of 5"

Based on what I've read are the minimum requirements for approving a transfer, school quality is not one of them; I welcome correction/clarification. It may be a motivator for the O'Connor petitioners, but I don't believe it's one of the minimum requirements.


Like this comment
Posted by Kate Bradshaw - Almanac Reporter
a resident of Menlo Park: Sharon Heights
on Sep 7, 2018 at 12:19 pm

Kate Bradshaw - Almanac Reporter is a registered user.

We've got an updated story here: Web Link. The appeal was denied.


Like this comment
Posted by Machiavelli
a resident of another community
on Oct 2, 2018 at 7:14 pm

Brian, I tip off my hat to you. The community needs more people like you. You seem to be an individual that is very informed about the current situation in RCSD. Along the way I have been able to meet people who had similar experiences like you. Please tell all your friends and family members to help create a change by supporting the election of three new board members. Thanks!
— Machiavelli


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Salt & Straw Palo Alto to open Nov. 23
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 2,597 views

Trials of My Grandmother
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 1,372 views

Lakes and Larders (part 2)
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,115 views