News

San Mateo County plans 100-plus affordable apartments, child care center

 
The planned complex will be built on a 3.2-acre parcel in North Fair Oaks. (Courtesy San Mateo County.)

San Mateo County has begun a process to contract with a developer to build at least 100 affordable housing units, a child care center and some community-serving commercial space at "Middlefield Junction," at 2700 Middlefield Road in North Fair Oaks, between Atherton and Redwood City.

The property, which the county owns, is a 3.2-acre parcel that was once a recycling facility, and is located just east of the North Fair Oaks Health Center, built in 2013. A key consideration in the development plans, according to county housing and community development policy specialist Heather Peters, is how the project will fit in with its surroundings, which include the health center and the Dumbarton Rail Spur, including a curved segment of railroad that ties the Caltrain rail to the Dumbarton rail line. The tracks are used an estimated two times per month, according to county documents.

The county has received four submissions following a request for proposals and is scheduled to make its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors for its Jan. 29 meeting. The proposals are not yet public because the county is still in negotiations, said Peters.

Once the developer is chosen, the county plans to begin a public outreach process in the spring, she said.

The priorities of housing and child care were identified through the North Fair Oaks Community Plan, completed in 2011, and a child care needs assessment completed for the county and Redwood City. The needs assessment found that there will be a shortfall of 350 infant spaces, 800 preschool spaces and 600 school-age spaces in Redwood City by 2025.

In addition, the county has requested up to 12,000 square feet to be community-serving commercial space – a term kept intentionally vague because the county aims to seek public input to determine how it's used, Peters said.

The county is expected to rezone the property to fit the development, and is likely to allow buildings 50 to 60 feet tall and residential densities up to 80 housing units per acre. The county is in the process of rezoning certain parts of North Fair Oaks for redevelopment and has so far completed two areas: Middlefield Road and El Camino Real. The area that this parcel is in, designated as "Phase 2B," is part of the next section to be rezoned.

The exact density will probably depend on the developer's planned mix of units, and how much structured or underground parking the developer can finance.

The developer will also likely have to contend with environmental contamination from the former on-site recycling facilities and the nearby rail lines.

All of the apartments will be designated for renters earning under 80 percent of the area median income, and some for renters in lower income categories, Peters said.

Though the zoning may change, a "master plan" has already been developed for the site, resulting from collaboration between county Supervisor Warren Slocum, Redwood City council member and former mayor John Seybert and retired Sequoia Healthcare District CEO Lee Michelson.

The county expects to negotiate successive 99-year ground leases with a developer, who will secure construction financing and own and manage the development on the property, according to the request for proposals document.

The county provided three alternative plans it expected developer proposals to take as a jumping-off point.

The alternatives are:

● In two phases, the construction of 130 apartments, a child care center and community-serving commercial space, estimated to cost $126 million.

● In one phase, the construction of 100 apartments, 31 townhouses, a child care center and community-serving commercial space, estimated to cost $113 million.

● In one phase, the construction of 130 apartments, the child care center and community-serving commercial space, with as much surface parking as possible, estimated cost $124 million.

The first option would have some apartments ready for occupancy within five years, and the rest within six; and the other options would be expected to be ready for occupancy within five years.

Another component of the plan is that the developer will be expected to work with households facing homelessness that are referred by the county's human services agency to provide them with some level of services at the site.

Funding the project is a complicated process, especially because it will permit multiple uses, Peters explained. "It's not like building a library or a single-use project where you just sell bonds and one person or entity pays for it," she said.

The opportunity to build affordable housing on a vacant lot is a rare one, she noted. " We have very few unused pieces of land in San Mateo County. ... The county is looking to incorporate affordable housing into every opportunity they can find for it."

--

Sign up for Almanac Express to get news updates. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

What is community worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

5 people like this
Posted by Bill Wall
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Nov 28, 2018 at 11:19 am

Tax payers get to pay for it again.


13 people like this
Posted by Mary H
a resident of another community
on Nov 28, 2018 at 1:14 pm

BETTER to SPEND tax payer money on providing more AFFORDABLE HOUSING to provide safe shelter to those who provide the Peninsula's necessary labor (at low hourly wages) THAN TO GIVE all kinds of tax breaks and other incentives to developers who build luxury apartments that charge over $4,500/mo for a two bedroom.


7 people like this
Posted by Kevin
a resident of Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
on Nov 28, 2018 at 1:43 pm

Kevin is a registered user.

@Bill Wall,

I think most of the funding for these types of projects comes from the local affordable housing fund, combined with the lion's share from the private developers. Cities collect "in lieu" fees from other developers when they don't build the requisite "below market rate" units into their own developments. So not paid for by tax payers, but indirectly subsidized by other developments in the city.

The Redwood City fund is running a deficit right now, but has $4M-$20M coming in over the next couple years, so there is a stream of non-taxpayer money to help finance this project.

Web Link


1 person likes this
Posted by Kevin
a resident of Portola Valley: Los Trancos Woods/Vista Verde
on Nov 28, 2018 at 1:43 pm

Kevin is a registered user.

@Bill Wall,

I think most of the funding for these types of projects comes from the local affordable housing fund, combined with the lion's share from the private developers. Cities collect "in lieu" fees from other developers when they don't build the requisite "below market rate" units into their own developments. So not paid for by tax payers, but indirectly subsidized by other developments in the city.

The Redwood City fund is running a deficit right now, but has $4M-$20M coming in over the next couple years, so there is a stream of non-taxpayer money to help finance this project.

Web Link


5 people like this
Posted by Judy A
a resident of Menlo Park: Downtown
on Nov 29, 2018 at 12:18 pm

Judy A is a registered user.

What income level is considered "affordable"? What we need are low-income units, a step or two below "affordable" so that our working poor can afford to live near there where they work and near good schools.


Like this comment
Posted by common sense
a resident of another community
on Dec 1, 2018 at 3:24 pm

What the county really needs is for employers to pay a high enough wage so that people can afford to live there, rather than having taxpayers subsidize employers' low wages to their employees.


1 person likes this
Posted by Menlo Voter.
a resident of Menlo Park: other
on Dec 1, 2018 at 9:16 pm

Menlo Voter. is a registered user.

"What the county really needs is for employers to pay a high enough wage so that people can afford to live there, rather than having taxpayers subsidize employers' low wages to their employees."

Which means we pay for it one way or another. If employers pay enough for their employees to afford living here they pass those costs along in higher prices. If we do it the other way, we pay higher taxes. We pay either way. Socialism at it's best .


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

DoorDash is opening a shared delivery kitchen in Redwood City. What does that say about the future of the restaurant industry?
By Elena Kadvany | 9 comments | 3,218 views

What did you learn last week?
By Sherry Listgarten | 14 comments | 1,866 views

Menlo Park Can Learn A Lot from Palo Alto (Part 1)
By Dana Hendrickson | 3 comments | 1,188 views

Bond. Bond Touch.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 933 views

The holiday season
By Cheryl Bac | 2 comments | 797 views