News


Bills to encourage housing density near transit advance in Senate

Lawmakers seek compromise between competing visions for addressing housing shortage

Two state bills that would allow more housing density in transit corridors cleared their first legislative hurdles this week, though each proposal will likely see significant changes before it becomes law.

Senate Bill 50, a proposal by Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, that would require cities to relax height, density and parking restrictions in "transit-rich" and "jobs-friendly" areas advanced on Tuesday when the Senate Housing Committee, which Wiener chairs, voted 9-1-1 to move the legislation forward.

Just after that vote, the committee voted to advance a different housing plan from Sens. Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, and Jim Beall, D-San Jose. Known as Senate Bill 4, the legislation would increase height limits in cities with 50,000 or more residents and relax parking requirements within half a mile of rail stations and ferry terminals.

Under SB 4, housing developments near transit areas in these cities will be able to have one story of height beyond what is currently zoned, as well as density bonuses.

"For example, if you live in a community that allows for three stories, you'd automatically receive a fourth story by right and a maximum build-out on that lot, within half a mile of a passenger rail line or ferry terminal," McGuire said at the April 2 hearing.

Unlike with SB 50, which would apply to all jurisdictions, SB 4 would have different criteria for large and small cities. For those with populations of 100,000 or more, there would be no parking requirements within a quarter mile of rail and a ratio of 0.5 spaces per unit between a quarter mile and half a mile from the transit area. For cities with fewer than 100,000 residents, the parking requirement would be 0.5 spaces per unit within half a mile (there would be no total waiver of parking requirements within a quarter mile of transit stops).

Another difference between the two bills is that SB 4 would only apply to jurisdictions that have built fewer homes than jobs in the past decade, while SB 50 would cover all cities and towns. And while SB 50 also provides incentives for housing near "high-quality bus corridors," SB 4 only provides building incentives in areas near rail and ferry terminals and exempts site in architectural or historically significant historic districts, coastal zones, flood plains and "fire hazard severity zones."

Though it largely focuses on transit corridors, SB 4 has one provision that is not tied to transportation at all. If it passes, fourplexes would be allowed "by right" at vacant parcels in cities with populations greater than 50,000. In smaller cities, duplexes would be allowed by right.

The bill, which McGuire said covers "90 percent of the state" advanced on Tuesday by an 8-1 vote. Wiener and McGuire had abstained from voting on each other's bills and agreed to work together in the weeks to come to reach a compromise solution. Both bills are set to go to the Senate Governance and Finance Committee on April 24.

In introducing SB 4, McGuire said the legislation advances "thoughtful strategies" that will help address the state's housing shortage. Echoing an often-repeated criticism of SB 50, McGuire said that a "blanket one-size-fits-all approach" does not work when it comes to housing solutions.

Much like Wiener's bill, SB 4 would have an "inclusionary housing" provision, requiring new developments that receive height and density concessions to designate some of their units as below-market-rate housing.

The April 24 meeting will take place almost exactly a year after the Housing Committee voted to reject Wiener's prior proposal to encourage more housing near transit. Known as SB 827, that bill died in the committee by a 4-6 vote, with both McGuire and Beall voting against it. Now, the legislators are hoping to reach a compromise that each side can support and that can win over the rest of their colleagues in the Legislature as well as Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has made housing one of his top priorities identified during his "State of the State" address.

While the legislation is still set for revisions, Wiener called the Tuesday vote on SB 50 an "important step toward addressing California's severe housing crisis."

"We need bold ideas that will have a real impact on our 3.5 million home deficit," Wiener said in a statement after the vote. "SB 50, in combination with other strong housing proposals, will help move the dial.

"California's housing shortage is threatening our environment, economy, diversity and quality of life. We must reform how we approach housing and, once and for all, elevate housing to a top priority."

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.

Comments

5 people like this
Posted by Corporate Take-Over
a resident of another community
on Apr 9, 2019 at 1:59 am

SB 50 is not about getting more housing near transit. It is supported by giant corporations that want more and cheaper housing for millions of current and planned employees. The tricky definitions in the bill actually would empower developers to build 4-8 story condos and apartments - with little or no onsite parking - in neighborhoods otherwise zoned for single family homes and businesses. Ambitious state legislators and big city mayors have been "sold" on SB 50. Most city councilmembers are against it - but there is a Russian-style suppression of the news about this topic. What does the MENLO PARK CITY COUNCIL HAVE TO SAY ABOUT SB 50 AND RELATED BILLS?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Vegan cafe to land in Mountain View this week
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 3,921 views

How Can We Fund Below Market Rate Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents in the Region?
By Steve Levy | 34 comments | 1,844 views

College Match
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 799 views

A Power Play
By Sherry Listgarten | 3 comments | 720 views

Piles of artwork
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 263 views

 

The Almanac Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "The Almanac Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 27th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 17th issue of The Almanac.

VOTE HERE