News

Policymakers: Public transit will go over 'fiscal cliff' without more state dollars

Coalition urges Gov. Gavin Newsom to allot greater public transit funding in upcoming state budget

A BART train arrives at the Pleasant Hill BART station in Walnut Creek, Calif. on Feb. 1, 2021. Courtesy Ray Saint Germain/Bay City News Foundation.

As the upcoming state budget deadline looms over California, state policymakers warned Gov. Gavin Newsom that his ambitious climate targets will crumble without adequate funding for public transportation.

On Tuesday, May 30, a coalition of state lawmakers, labor leaders, environmental activists and transit officials stressed that public transportation will go over a "fiscal cliff" if it does not receive more state dollars. And if public transportation is not saved, it can cause lasting harm to the state's economy and people's quality of life.

Last week the California Transit Association (CTA), a group of transit agencies and public transit proponents, issued a $5.15 billion budget proposal over the next five years for transit agencies to stay afloat. For the upcoming fiscal year, the budget calls for another $213 million from the General Fund and to utilize excess federal highway funds and cap-and-trade profits.

The numbers come in response to many agencies' dwindling ridership numbers post COVID-19, federal pandemic relief funds drying up, and public outcry for safer rides on buses and rail systems.

Though numerous proposals are in the works throughout the state legislature that could provide more funding for public transit operations, the coalition says it's nowhere near enough to make up for the proposed $2 billion cut in transit infrastructure that Newsom is considering, and would only use transit capital funds for non-capital purposes.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Michael Pimentel, executive director of the CTA, stressed that these funds are a "hand-up and a bridge forward," not a handout. He said challenges in recent years pushed agencies to reinvent their services and find funding elsewhere.

Now the CTA is asking for additional support from largely, non-general fund sources, recognizing the situation in which the state has found itself, Pimentel said.

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), a key player in the call for more transit funds, said that as public transportation adjusts to changes in ridership patterns, the state must ensure that the systems can survive.

"You cannot reform a system that has fallen apart. Left unchecked, these budget shortfalls will cause devastating and possibly permanent damage to our public transportation systems," Wiener said.

Wiener said he's already heard of potential major service cuts in the Bay Area, like MUNI eliminating 20 bus lines, or BART ending weekend rides entirely.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

And with those service cuts comes a "transit death spiral," he said -- with less frequent service, transit becomes less accessible, so people choose not to take public transit at all. Which only leads to more budget cuts that come at a cost for the disproportionate levels of seniors, low-income people and students who depend on transit systems to get around.

"This is a do or die moment for public transportation in California," he said.

East Bay Assembly member Buffy Wicks said a lack of transit funding would not only affect the commuters and schoolkids who depend on public transportation to get around, but could also affect the state's climate and housing goals.

"Our housing policy is predicated on the idea of our transit and our housing working together, so that could be undermined," Wicks said.

"Yes, we need accountability and reforms, but funding must come first," she said.

BART Director Rebecca Saltzman said new funding is needed to keep BART's operating budget stable, or else severe cuts in service and staff could take place as early as this year, which also affects its relationships with its labor partners. Trains may run only once an hour, or entire lines could be shuttered, she said.

"These devastating service cuts would turn away riders and send transit into a death spiral that would dramatically impact the quality of life in the Bay Area for everyone, not just transit riders," Saltzman said. "Traffic would worsen across our already congested roadways and bridges, and greenhouse gas emissions would increase further fueling climate change."

Melissa Romero of California Environmental Voters said that public transit investments are not just a matter of finances or climate metrics, it's also a matter of social justice.

"It's a matter of justice and fairness," she said. "We cannot afford to overlook the transformative power that public transit holds in promoting social and economic equality.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow AlmanacNews.com and The Almanac on Twitter @almanacnews, Facebook and on Instagram @almanacnews for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Policymakers: Public transit will go over 'fiscal cliff' without more state dollars

Coalition urges Gov. Gavin Newsom to allot greater public transit funding in upcoming state budget

by Olivia Wynkoop/Bay City News /

Uploaded: Thu, Jun 1, 2023, 9:37 am

As the upcoming state budget deadline looms over California, state policymakers warned Gov. Gavin Newsom that his ambitious climate targets will crumble without adequate funding for public transportation.

On Tuesday, May 30, a coalition of state lawmakers, labor leaders, environmental activists and transit officials stressed that public transportation will go over a "fiscal cliff" if it does not receive more state dollars. And if public transportation is not saved, it can cause lasting harm to the state's economy and people's quality of life.

Last week the California Transit Association (CTA), a group of transit agencies and public transit proponents, issued a $5.15 billion budget proposal over the next five years for transit agencies to stay afloat. For the upcoming fiscal year, the budget calls for another $213 million from the General Fund and to utilize excess federal highway funds and cap-and-trade profits.

The numbers come in response to many agencies' dwindling ridership numbers post COVID-19, federal pandemic relief funds drying up, and public outcry for safer rides on buses and rail systems.

Though numerous proposals are in the works throughout the state legislature that could provide more funding for public transit operations, the coalition says it's nowhere near enough to make up for the proposed $2 billion cut in transit infrastructure that Newsom is considering, and would only use transit capital funds for non-capital purposes.

Michael Pimentel, executive director of the CTA, stressed that these funds are a "hand-up and a bridge forward," not a handout. He said challenges in recent years pushed agencies to reinvent their services and find funding elsewhere.

Now the CTA is asking for additional support from largely, non-general fund sources, recognizing the situation in which the state has found itself, Pimentel said.

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), a key player in the call for more transit funds, said that as public transportation adjusts to changes in ridership patterns, the state must ensure that the systems can survive.

"You cannot reform a system that has fallen apart. Left unchecked, these budget shortfalls will cause devastating and possibly permanent damage to our public transportation systems," Wiener said.

Wiener said he's already heard of potential major service cuts in the Bay Area, like MUNI eliminating 20 bus lines, or BART ending weekend rides entirely.

And with those service cuts comes a "transit death spiral," he said -- with less frequent service, transit becomes less accessible, so people choose not to take public transit at all. Which only leads to more budget cuts that come at a cost for the disproportionate levels of seniors, low-income people and students who depend on transit systems to get around.

"This is a do or die moment for public transportation in California," he said.

East Bay Assembly member Buffy Wicks said a lack of transit funding would not only affect the commuters and schoolkids who depend on public transportation to get around, but could also affect the state's climate and housing goals.

"Our housing policy is predicated on the idea of our transit and our housing working together, so that could be undermined," Wicks said.

"Yes, we need accountability and reforms, but funding must come first," she said.

BART Director Rebecca Saltzman said new funding is needed to keep BART's operating budget stable, or else severe cuts in service and staff could take place as early as this year, which also affects its relationships with its labor partners. Trains may run only once an hour, or entire lines could be shuttered, she said.

"These devastating service cuts would turn away riders and send transit into a death spiral that would dramatically impact the quality of life in the Bay Area for everyone, not just transit riders," Saltzman said. "Traffic would worsen across our already congested roadways and bridges, and greenhouse gas emissions would increase further fueling climate change."

Melissa Romero of California Environmental Voters said that public transit investments are not just a matter of finances or climate metrics, it's also a matter of social justice.

"It's a matter of justice and fairness," she said. "We cannot afford to overlook the transformative power that public transit holds in promoting social and economic equality.

Comments

CyberVoter
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Jun 1, 2023 at 1:38 pm
CyberVoter, Menlo Park: other
Registered user
on Jun 1, 2023 at 1:38 pm

There is a reason that the public transit in the Bay Area is in fiscal trouble:
- It is run by zealots that do not care what the public wants & will force them into their "Utopia"
- Meanwhile - look at the # of riders on public transit!. the buses that i see have (at most) only a very few passengers on a long, two section articulated bus!
- It would be cheaper (& better in all ways) to sell the buses & replace them with much smaller coaches and even subsidized "Uber" cars.
- The MTC is NOT providing transit anyone wants! (Do the politicians ride the bus????)
- I will never ride BART again & am very concerned for my health & safety when I ride Caltrain
Please stop throwing my tax dollars away on a broken system. Start with a "clean sheet" and provide what the residents want & NOT what the politicians & "City Planners" want them to use!

It is time for a wholesale change - including new leadership!


Joseph E. Davis
Registered user
Woodside: Emerald Hills
on Jun 2, 2023 at 1:02 pm
Joseph E. Davis, Woodside: Emerald Hills
Registered user
on Jun 2, 2023 at 1:02 pm

BART is such a horror show that its Newsom appointed auditor resigned in disgust a couple months ago due to the stonewalling of its board, management, and unions.

Why should they get a single extra dollar to burn on their bonfire of self-dealing and incompetence?


Menlo Voter.
Registered user
Menlo Park: other
on Jun 2, 2023 at 9:15 pm
Menlo Voter., Menlo Park: other
Registered user
on Jun 2, 2023 at 9:15 pm

BART and other public transit are perfect examples of what make Corruptifornia


pogo
Registered user
Woodside: other
on Jun 4, 2023 at 7:37 am
pogo, Woodside: other
Registered user
on Jun 4, 2023 at 7:37 am

My wife and I have a little game of checking out the number of riders inside those huge, sleek, expensive buses as we drive along El Camino Real. The game is whether the number of passengers on a bus will be zero or one passenger.

Try it yourself.

Spoiler alert: it’s almost always zero.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.