|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo and more than 20 members of the U.S. Congress journeyed to Texas last Friday to visit immigration detention facilities where hundreds of adults and children are being held after they tried to enter the United States.
The conversations Eshoo had with distraught mothers, she said Monday, are keeping her awake at night.
In the Brownsville, Texas, facility – under the control of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – Eshoo met with at least seven mothers whose children had been taken away.
“They were beside themselves and filled with grief and worry. They had no idea where their children were; no one could tell them; they didn’t know how long they were going to be held there. They were in prison uniforms,” she said.
Under the Trump Administration’s “zero tolerance” policy, thousands of people have been taken into custody in recent months and are being held in detention cells and cages while they await deportation, prosecution or an asylum hearing. Many hundreds of children have been separated from their parents.
On June 20, facing widespread bipartisan outrage, President Trump issued an executive order that reversed the practice of separating children from their families. But those family members who are already apart remain that way for now.
More than 2,053 children were being held in U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)-funded facilities as of June 20. An additional 522 children had been reunited with their parents.
About 17 percent were separated from their parents at the border; 83 percent arrived in the U.S. without a parent or guardian, according to a June 23 Health and Human Services statement.
What deeply troubled Eshoo during the visit is that the agencies didn’t seem prepared to implement the administration’s policy. There is no dual-tracking system for the children who have been separated from their parent, she said.
The children have only a telephone number of a relative pinned to their clothing. Some Border Patrol and ICE agents told Eshoo that parents wrote the phone number of relatives on their child’s shoes before they were taken away. But many of the children are so small that they don’t even know their last names or even their parents’ first names, she said.
HHS staff said children are allowed to speak to their parents at least twice a week. But Eshoo said she did not find a mother who said that has actually happened. Parents were given instructions on how to use a free phone service, but Eshoo said the system doesn’t work. The mother must have some resources to pay for the minutes they’re on the phone, and many have nothing, they said.
“The mothers were so distraught. We asked questions, and they were just continually weeping and sobbing. They were given some tear sheets that ICE had given to everyone that said to ‘call this number so that you can be connected with your child.’ I’ve been calling the number and no one answers,” Eshoo said.
HHS issued a three-page press release on June 23, “Zero-Tolerance Prosecution and Family Reunification,” which states that federal employees know where all of the children are located. It refutes reports that the agencies are disorganized, and it claims to have a process for reunification.
“A parent who is ordered removed from the U.S. may request that his or her minor child accompany them. It should be noted that in the past many parents have elected to be removed without their children,” the officials stated.
Eshoo disputed that claim.
“I never heard one of the mothers say that. We asked them that,” she said.
The mothers are also told they can ask ICE personnel to help them locate their child.
“None of this works for any of the mothers we met with. So it sounds very tidy, like it’s a parent hotline, but it didn’t work for them. And almost to a person – that is, the mothers – they didn’t have the resources to make the phone calls.
“None have them have seen attorneys,” she said. “They have no idea when they will have an appointment to be interviewed relative to their status. They have been informed of nothing.”
The administration has also moved to keep the children and their parents in custody indefinitely. Under the Flores settlement, a class-action lawsuit affecting the treatment of undocumented children, the government can’t hold minors in detention for more than 20 days. The Trump administration wants the courts to lift the limitation.
Trump has requested that the Department of Defense identify bases in the United States where people can be housed – up to 20,000 individuals.
“So it sounds to me like the administration is doubling down,” Eshoo said. “To think that in the 21st century, that in the United States of America, … the intention of the administration is to build more internment camps is so horrible that really this is a stain on the soul of America.”
Children are reportedly being sent to states far away from where their parents are held. Each has its own laws pertaining to minors and care facilities, she said.
“I think the reason the administration wants to detain people on military bases is that state laws governing licensing facilities … for keeping the kids don’t apply,” she said.
At the Border Patrol Processing Center in McAllen, Texas, which is run as an intake facility, Eshoo saw about 25 to 30 children in each roughly 20-by-20-foot chain-link-fenced cell, and there were numerous cells lining the long hall.
Once a day for a half hour, those children big enough to walk get to run around outside.
“Most of them were very small children and babies. There were a handful of adults – women who bottle-fed the babies,” she said. She doubted that the oldest was even 5 years old, she added.
As they toured the facility, members of Congress attempted to give the children little felt animals, but Border Patrol staff would not allow it.
“Border Patrol said it was the rules. I said, ‘What rules?'”
“Well, we have rules,” was the reply.
“‘Well, who wrote the rules?'” she asked.
“You know, they have their jobs to do and they’re doing it, but there’s very little leeway to extend a loving hand to these little innocents,” she said.
Eshoo didn’t know if what the Congress members saw was staged or not. The facilities she saw were clean enough but are not comfortable.
“People are fed and they have clothes on, but they have no privacy whatsoever. The older people were just standing around and also the children, without any kind of spirit. It’s so heavily laden with sadness,” she said.
“The individuals that were being held had a very dazed look to them. It was as if they were almost devoid of emotion or that they were undergoing something that was obviously traumatic,” she said.
At the very large facility in Brownsville, the congressional members asked if there were doctors or social workers.
“They said there were something like four social workers, and there were hundreds and hundreds of people there. That’s hardly enough.
For Eshoo, the effects of such incarceration and separation are personal.
“I know from my own mother, when she came to the United States, she traveled with her mother. … They came through Ellis Island. She was separated from her mother for about a week, and it scarred her. It scarred her. She couldn’t speak any English; she didn’t know where she was; she didn’t know anyone there. She couldn’t eat. She sobbed. She couldn’t sleep.
“There was a woman. She remembered she had many tags on her, and the woman approached her and saw she had an Armenian surname. The woman spoke Armenian and she comforted my mother. Mom always said she remembered that she laid down with her on her cot and held her.
“And you know, she lived to be almost 91 years old, and two nights before she died she was still calling out for her mother. So that trauma for children is scarring,” Eshoo said.
Back in Washington, Eshoo said she will make due process her top priority.
“Most of the people we met with had presented themselves at the border seeking asylum. We have laws relative to asylum in our legal immigration system, and there are international laws that govern asylum as well. But they have not seen any lawyers,” she said.
“Both Border Patrol and ICE said that there would be lawyers after they have an interview, which was confusing to me because once they have the interview they’re informed whether their case is accepted or not. And if not, they are deported immediately,” she said.
Eshoo said she is not against border controls.
“I believe anyone who presents themselves must be vetted. We don’t want criminals, we don’t want cartels and drug movers coming into the country. We have to guard our borders, but these children are not a threat to our national security,” she said.
“The (administration) is not going to be able to continue these mass incarcerations if the Congress doesn’t appropriate the money. I think to a member that was part of the congressional delegation to Texas, the thought was that it was absolutely essential that there be a firestorm on the part of appropriators relative to putting the money up.
“It’s one thing to say you have policy, but if you don’t have money to drive it you don’t really have a policy. The appropriators really need to know what’s being spent, and the Congress, again, holds the purse strings. That’s in the Constitution,” she said.
“This is a tremendously costly operation,” she said, noting that a prior policy vetted undocumented immigrants, put tracking ankle devices on them and allowed them a hearing before deportation. It was much less costly. The administration quietly ended that program before instituting zero tolerance, she said.
“The cost of that (previous) program was something like $3.45 per day per individual. It is now something like $45 a day per individual,” she said.
What can Americans do?
“However someone views this, they should call their member of Congress and let them know. There are consequences to elections, and we have elections coming up in November. Everyone – everyone – should use their right to vote and go out to vote because this will not change unless there is a change in the policy,” she said.
On June 22, Eshoo sent a letter to HHS Secretary Alex M. Azar II asking for an accounting of how many children are being held in facilities in her district and where they are located.
“I think I have a right to that information,” she said, but she added that she hasn’t yet received a response.
American citizens are decent people, she added.
“I asked the translator to communicate to the mothers that, because they don’t know what’s happening outside the walls of where they are, that everyone in the country knows that this is taking place,” she said.
“The American people are good and decent. … They are appalled by it. We believe in the sanctity of the family; that the family unit is the core of our society and of all societies. And they wept some more. They cried even more.”





Eshoo: Immigrant detention centers ‘a stain on America’
Stealing the children of asylum seekers and putting them in prison camps will surely be marked by future generations as one of the most shameful chapters in the history of our country.
If there was a wall, we wouldn’t need detention centers.
Mark: “If there was a wall” There IS a wall. Walls just don’t work. Here’s a visually stunning photo of our wall (sorry Mark, does not show the tunnels built under it.) https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/05/26/upshot/26UP-Walls-9/26UP-Walls-9-superJumbo.jpg
Mark, as soon as Mexico sends the check to pay for it, I’m all in for a newer wall. It would be a great make-work project for labor that would drive up costs of materials and wages for other projects, as well . All on Mexico’s dime. Yippee! Otherwise useless, other than as a campaign prop for low IQ voters. We have better things to spend $25-50 billion on – roads, healthcare, Space Force heroes, etc..
Really though, what wall has ever really worked? The Great Wall? The Berlin Wall? Hadrian Wall?
The Kremlin wall?
The walls in Belfast erected during The Troubles?
Arguable, the Warsaw Ghetto Wall served it’s evil purpose. But even it was torn down by the Germans themselves.
(Godwin wins again.) https://twitter.com/sfmnemonic?lang=en
These comments are my own opinion and views:
Immigration detention Centers serve a purpose in protecting our Great County, By holding ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES who into our County ILLEGALLY!!!! So they can be processed, checked and brought before a Immigration Court. For a Judge to decide their out come.
I will say this, I do not believe child or young teenagers should be separated from their parents.
However accounting to a report over 95% have no documentation to provide who they are! So if the authorities left children with ILLEGAL immigrants who say they are the parents and something happens to the child or the children are assaulted etc its the authorities who will be sued. Therefore there needs to be checks done to make sure these value children are protected at all times.
second point is when you fly out of the County or to another State you go though checks at the airport, first passport checks which they check background etc, there a bag and body search before even getting on a airplane. Yet illegal immigrants who cross the border have no checks and the ones released to come back to ICE never show up according to several reports.
I’m an immigrant myself I had to wait several years in line to get my green card, I had to have a medical check, background check, credit check, have no criminal records or criminal activity, be of good character and follow the law of the land. I had to provide I can support my family without any Government support or funding. I was interview 3-5 times before I was given and accepted for my green card even though my wife is American and so are my daughters, they were living in the US while I had to wait outside the US for my application to be approved.
So tell me why these illegal immigrants are allowed to stay in the county and I have to wait outside? why are they allowed to jump the line when 1000’s have been waiting and following the law for many many years before they are allowed in the US? How are they going to support their family with no job? or money? (oh yes you the good old American tax payer). lets not also forget I had to paid for my application, green card, medical check, background and others for my application to be accepted.(People who cross illegal do not!)
If we have no borders we have no County, if we get to pick and choose which laws to follow and when – we have no control or safety or protection.
The previous post frames the whole rant based on a lie: “By holding ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES who into our County ILLEGALLY”
For example: someone who presents themselves at a port of entry seeking asylum is not an illegal IMMIGRATES.
And to rip their children from them, putting the children into internment camps? No amount of absurd re-framing will change the subject of this topic: Immigrant detention centers ‘a stain on America’
@November’s Clorox
If one presents one’s self to the appropriate authorities at a border facility and asks for asylum, the “family” is not “torn apart.” However, if one enters the country illegally (meaning, breaks a law), then, like any normal American who breaks a law, they will be separated from their children as they await the legal process to unfold. This happens all the time, everywhere across America. Citizens who break laws get separated from their children. What makes illegal immigrants (who break laws) subject to better treatment than a citizen? Peter’s arguments are excellent. If you want to come into the US, take a number, wait in line and go through legal due process. Otherwise, if you enter illegally, you are subject to detention and deportment. Very straightforward.
Inon lies about actual facts, starting with her first sentence: “If one presents one’s self to the appropriate authorities at a border facility and asks for asylum, the “family” is not “torn apart.”
Wrong. Please consider more varied news sources. Listening to fringe ‘news’ outlets or the present administration will not give a full picture. Example: DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen lied on June 17 via Twitter: “For those seeking asylum at ports of entry, we have continued the policy from previous administrations and will only separate if the child is in danger, there is no custodial relationship between ‘family’ members, or if the adult has broken a law.”
Demonstrably false.
Also, here are two examples of an asylum seekers losing their children. Both are ongoing lawsuits, so they are easy to look up. From the ACLU:
– Ms. L, a Congolese mother who sought asylum at a port of entry, had her seven-year-old daughter taken away from her for four months. Immigration authorities made no meaningful attempt to verify their relationship during that time, only doing so after we filed our lawsuit.
– Mirian G, a mother from Honduras, came to the U.S. with her young son on Feb. 20, 2018. She presented herself to immigration authorities and sought asylum, committing no crime. During her interview, Mirian provided immigration officers with several identification documents for her child which listed her as his mother. The next morning, Border Patrol agents took away her 18-month-old son with no explanation. She did not see him again for two months.
I find it fascinating to hear what sound like otherwise rational people trying to defend the indefensible.
Defending the detention of children in internment camps, with miscast frames filled with lies? A four year old ripped from her mother for 4 months! Indefensible.
Indeed, quite the stain on our great country.
—
https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrants-rights/immigrants-rights-and-detention/fact-checking-family-separation
Fact-Checking Family Separation
JUNE 19, 2018
* a SEVEN year old girl ripped from her mother for 4 months.
Excuse the typo.
Looks like maybe (until verified in court of law—just because the ACLU says something does not mean it is so—-you might want to use less biased sources)there are two cases out of the hundreds of thousands of legal asylum seekers where kids were separated (like I said, maybe). The point remains that separating kids of lawbreakers from parents is standard practice in American legal system.
Inon – you said they were NOT torn apart.
What up?
Were they or not?
re the ACLU – trust them more than an anonymous poster who won’t link to prove claims that don’t pan out.
Families torn apart.
Mardy:
Looks like 2 out of several hundred thousand were separated. Why? Maybe there was a good reason, but appealing to the ACLU website for an unbiased response is ridiculous. The point remains that criminals (read “illegal immigrants) being separated from their children is nothing that normal American citizens experience when they break the law and are incarcerated.
And, as a response to “Families torn apart”: one could argue that the actions of the parents who send their kids here accompanied only by a “coyote” are tearing their own families apart, and that parents who subject their families to a terrible illegal border crossing, through their illegal actions, are also tearing their own families apart.
Mardy and November’s Clorox:
Maybe a question to ask you is why do you want the border and our country flooded with illegal immigrants? There are likely tens of millions of people, if given the chance, who would come to the US. From Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Venezuela, countless countries in Africa and the Mid-East, parts of Asia. Do you think that our borders should be open to them all? Yes or No? If yes, then what are the criteria for letting them in and who pays for them when they come? Do you believe that our country should have secure borders and that we should be selective about who we allow to enter?
Still choosing to die on the hill of: “families are not being torn apart”. Despite all you read and see from varied sources, court filings and even Trump’s own hasty backpedaling with an executive order (though incompetently incomplete and poorly drafted, ie. “Trumpian”.)
Got it.
The only folks that want your so-called tens million immigrants (that I can tell) are the corporations that fund both parties, in order to drive down wages. That’s why the GOP run House has never passed an immigration bill that would work.
Back to the topic: why do you support the moral abomination of tearing families apart?
“… one could argue that the actions of the parents who send their kids here accompanied only by a “coyote” are tearing their own families apart …”
Yes, one could argue that. Some in fact do. But can one argue that a government should scatter families to hold the children hostage until the parents agree to be deported? Well, I can see how some deplorables would, and in fact do. Many of these infest the new swamp now fouling our nation’s capital.
The major crime these “illegals” are committing is called Immigrating While Brown.” Would our law’n order types be so lathered up if Norwegians were slipping in? I think not.
The Great Trump Swamp exercises a strong influence on the deplorable class, exploiting its primal bigotry to distract while cleaning out what little remains in its pockets. All in plain sight.
The apparent lack of compassion in our own community is frightening.
Inon makes a great deal of sense. Can’t wait for the huge blue tidal wave to appear. It will be more like the out of touch Socialist Democrats singing the blues and I want to thank Maxine Waters for her efforts which are really helping the GOP. Go Maxine, Go!
My, my, my, “Observer” — grasping at straws, are we now?
Then again, when you support a president who is more chummy with Vladimir Putin than with our NATO allies, your sense of reasonable and unreasonable gets massively out of whack…
Dear Same old Liberal Nonsense,
You never make peace by talking with your friends. You make peace by talking with your enemies. This is why the Democratic Party is failing. They are stuck in their same old myopic thinking.
“Observer” — “You never make peace by talking with your friends. You make peace by talking with your enemies.”
Correct. But what -45 is doing is most certainly *not* talking; the proper term is “groveling.” For all intents and purposes, -45 has become Putin’s lapdog, to the point where he still insists on denying that the Russians interfered in the 2016 elections (a point acknowledged by every other U.S. governmental official).
But when you’re a charter member of Cult -45, facts don’t matter.
The only groveling that will be done will be by the Democratic Party on November 7 when they realize hat their socialist rhetoric combined with their great platform of scintillating ideas such as 1) We want to raise your taxes, We want to go soft on crime, and we hate Trump. What a bunch of losers.
That the best you can do, “Observer”? Or should that be Sergei Sergevich?
Either way, apologizing for -45 must mean ignoring the facts, and throwing garbage around, hoping some of it sticks…
So 44 nearly wrecked the country and 45 is reviving it and you want an apology? You should talk to the DNC Leadership. They have plenty to apologize for and will have some more to apologize for come November 7.
I waited for seven years and came in through the legal system. First a work permit and then a green card and now I’m waiting for my citizenship. You people are shocking the way you approve of illegal people coming into this beautiful country. Peter and mark L are spot on. These people are illegal and they should not be even be allowed to step foot on American soil. Go the legal route stand in line and wait your turn and not just barge in and produce a baby for what they call anchor baby. In my country if you come in and get caught by the officials they put you immediately in prison and less you can pay your way out. America is a fabulous country and I have great respect for the legal immigrants here but I have zero respect for people who try to steal their immigration by sneaking over the border. God bless America.
“Go the legal route” – The legal route for asylum seekers IS to present oneself at the point of entry/border.
That’s where they had their kids ripped away from them and pout into interment camps.
That’s why the thread topic is: “Immigrant detention centers ‘a stain on America'”