This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

Stacks of purple and white mail-in ballot envelopes sit on a stable as election workers sort them. The arms and hands of the workers are visible, but the faces are not. The focus is on the ballots.
Election workers process ballots at the Shasta County Clerk Registrar of Voters office in Redding on Oct. 30, 2024. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters

President Donald Trump on Monday rehashed his disdain for mail-in voting — a method that Trump has often attacked as part of the reason he lost the presidential election in 2020. 

During a meeting with Ukraine’s president, Trump said that lawyers are working to draft an executive order to end mail-in ballots before the 2026 midterm elections. That same day on social media, Trump said, without evidence, that mail-in ballots and voting machines are a scam and “a complete and total disaster.” 

But in a state where vote-by-mail has been available by default for all Californians since 2021, can Trump really do that? 

Though the U.S. has allowed people to vote by mail since the Civil War, its usage and accessibility ramped up in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Experts say that while voting by mail does increase the risk of fraud compared to in-person voting, mail-in voting fraud is still exceedingly rare.

Voters are more likely to get hit by lightning than to commit mail ballot fraud, said California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, citing one analysis.

Though some California Republicans in Congress supported Trump’s unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud, state GOP leaders have embraced mail voting. Of the more than 16 million votes cast by Californians during the 2024 general election, more than 13 million, or nearly 81%, was through vote-by-mail.

  • State Sen. Sabrina Cervantes, a Riverside Democrat and chairperson of the Senate elections committee: “Mail-in balloting gives voters who may experience challenges, such as health or even distance from voting centers, their right to vote.”

In addition to putting the Republican party and strategists in a bind, Trump’s pledges to eliminate mail-in voting by the end of next year is also unlikely. Congress has the authority to oversee federal elections, and should the president move ahead with his plan, “we will fight to defend our democracy,” said Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, the chairperson of the Assembly elections committee.

  • Pellerin, a Santa Cruz Democrat: “While I understand that Trump has a difficult time understanding the Constitution and the limits of his power, the truth is that he does not have the authority to do this.”

Focus on Inland Empire: Each Wednesday, CalMatters Inland Empire reporter Deborah Brennan surveys the big stories from that part of California. Read her newsletter and sign up here to receive it.

GOP’s Hail Mary to stop redistricting

A person in a suit gestures toward a large poster of California’s district map labeled “Rigged Map” in red text, during a press conference inside a government building with ornate arches and a domed ceiling. Several people and news microphones are visible around them.
Republican Assemblymember James Gallagher during a press conference at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Aug. 18, 2025. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters

Speaking of the 2026 elections, a group of Republican legislators said Tuesday that they are suing to stop the state from advancing Gov. Gavin Newsom’s mid-cycle redistricting plan, reports CalMatters’ Maya C. Miller

The emergency petition, filed with the California Supreme Court, relates to a three-bill package that Democrats in the Legislature are scrambling to pass that would enable voters to accept or reject redrawn congressional maps during a Nov. 4 special election. 

The GOP lawmakers said that Democrats are violating the state constitution by sidestepping a rule that requires legislation, with some exceptions, to be publicly available for 30 days before lawmakers can vote on it. 

Read more here.

Also Tuesday, CalMatters’ Alexei Koseff was at the Capitol speaking to Republican voters who happened to be traveling to Sacramento to protest against an unrelated bill. When word spread that the Legislature was holding hearings to weigh the redistricting proposal, dozens of them mobilized to voice their opposition to that too

  • David Bolog, a maintenance worker with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power: “We already feel very unrepresented. Even though you know it’s not going to stop it, you still have to say no.”

Read more here.

CA’s clean energy plan in the Trump era

Hydrogen-powered trucks at IMC headquarters in Compton on Oct. 29, 2024. Photo by Carlin Stiehl for CalMatters

In their first formal response since the Trump administration undercut a handful of California’s climate policies during the past few months, state regulators unveiled guidelines Tuesday that aim to reaffirm California’s clean energy initiatives, write CalMatters’ Alejandro Lazo and Alejandra Reyes-Velarde.

The proposals include recommending more private investment, asking the Legislature to backfill electric vehicle incentives and rewriting clean car rules. Several state agencies developed the recommendations as a joint effort in response to Newsom’s June executive order directing regulators to double down on transitioning away from fossil fuels. 

Though the chairperson of California’s Air Resources Board said “California … will not give up on cleaner air and better public health,” some climate experts said the suggestions weren’t aggressive enough.

  • Daniel Sperling, a former air board member and current director of UC Davis’ Institute for Transportation Studies: “I’m puzzled, actually, because they had acted like they were really going to do something significant.”

A spokesman for the governor said Newsom would review the proposals. 

Read more here.

And lastly: ‘Compensation’ for Eaton Fire victims?

Flames and smoke can be seen coming out of a building as businesses in the Altadena area burn due to the Eaton Fire. Nearby, a person rides their bike as burnt debris float in the sky as smoke fills the atmosphere.
Businesses burn as a result of the Eaton Fire in Altadena on Jan. 8, 2025. Photo by Ted Soqui for CalMatters

Southern California Edison says it plans to create a compensation program this fall to pay for Eaton Fire claims. CalMatters’ Malena Carollo and video strategy director Robert Meeks have a video segment on why survivors remain skeptical of the utility company’s proposal as part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it here.

SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal.

Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.

White House gets key facts wrong as it blames CA for three traffic deaths in FL // San Francisco Chronicle

Oklahoma ideology test for teachers from NY and CA draws criticism // AP News

CA teachers still waiting for paid pregnancy leave after Assembly bill fails to advance // EdSource

Public funding for elections? The idea is back in CA // LAist

As CA’s proposed redistricting maps are released, North State representatives push back // Shasta Scout

Anaheim warns of ‘most significant and disruptive’ immigration raids as feds swarm city // Los Angeles Times

UCLA’s Jewish community unites against Trump’s $1B demand // Los Angeles Times

The summer’s most dangerous heat wave is set to broil SoCal, elevating fire and health risks // Los Angeles Times

CalMatters is a Sacramento-based nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism venture committed to explaining how California's state Capitol works and why it matters. It works with more than 130 media partners throughout the state that have long, deep relationships with their local audiences, including Embarcadero Media.

Most Popular

Leave a comment