This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
Re: “Why building more homes near transit will transform lives across California“
As a former city council member, much of the commentary surrounding Senate Bill 79 can be exasperating. SB 79 seems to be based on little more than drawing circles around transit stops. This is not planning.
The Legislature already requires local jurisdictions to plan and zone for far more housing through the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, or RHNA (pronounced ree-nah). Along with state reviewers, California’s 540 local jurisdictions have spent countless dollars on RHNA over the years.
SB 79 throws a wrench into the process.
The goal of upzoning should be to shape development so that taller apartments are built along
transit corridors. This increase in density creates more foot traffic on the street, allowing shops and restaurants to thrive. It also increases the number of commuters who can easily be served by transit.
Too much upzoning, like that proposed by SB 79, will allow developers to spread out buildings over a wide area, randomly dotting the landscape with expensive apartment towers. This does nothing to bring about the benefits of urban density.
Both chairs of the Senate Housing Committee, Democrat Aisha Wahab and Republican Kelly Seyarto, have consistently voted against SB 79. Other legislators should follow their example.
The chair of the Senate Local Government Committee, Sen. María Elena Durazo, a Democrat, also voted no on SB 79. Many cities oppose the bill. Recently the Los Angeles City Council has voted against SB 79 too.
Last Saturday, people rallied against SB 79 in San Francisco, Marin County, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Fernando Valley…