|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Menlo Park is trying to engage Spanish-speaking and Belle Haven residents in City Council meetings through interpretation and transportation services but has yet to build a recurring group of users.
A staff report created for the Menlo Park City Council shows the city has offered round-trip shuttles for three meetings and Spanish interpretation at some meetings over the past two years. The services began in hopes of reducing barriers to participation for non-English speakers and residents without transportation.
Shuttle service to the city council chambers from Belle Haven has been provided for three meetings since 2023. Two of those trips had no riders, and the third, on June 10, served eight people. Each shuttle service costs the city about $200 per meeting for driver wages and vehicle expenses.
At one meeting, a Spanish-speaking resident tried to give comments at a city council meeting without interpretation. While a local resident volunteered to provide interpretation services for that meeting, the city moved the interpretation form to a more prominent space on the council’s website.
Anyone can request Spanish interpretation at a meeting at least 72 hours before the meeting. Since launching in May, the city has received two requests through the form.
Menlo Park proactively reserves four interpreters but needs to decide whether to ask for their services at least 48 hours before the meeting. Interpretation comes at a cost. The city needs four interpreters for a meeting — two in person and two virtual — at a cost of $135 to $160 per hour, per interpreter, with a two-hour minimum. The city paid $3,540 for interpretation at the May 13 meeting and $3,000 at the June 10 meeting.
City staff is exploring the use of artificial intelligence for live interpretation to reduce costs.
The city also translates select written materials, such as specific staff reports and agenda items, at a rate of 20 cents per word, plus a $30 rush fee for 24-hour turnaround. Translation of a quarterly police report in May cost $586.80, while an Environmental Justice report in September 2024 cost $221.10.
Menlo Park adopted an Environmental Justice Element last year with goals to improve air quality and ensure equitable civic engagement. Part of the plan calls for holding council meetings in underserved neighborhoods twice a year and incorporating multilingual outreach. One meeting was held at the Belle Haven Community Campus in March, and a second is planned for fall.
Thirty-eight percent of Menlo Park residents speak a language other than English at home, including 15% of residents who speak Spanish. City officials say the services are intended to make participation easier as there could be more residents who would prefer Spanish interpretation than are counted in official statistics. However, there is currently no dedicated budget line for meeting accessibility. Costs have been absorbed through the city clerk’s contract services budget.
So is this the City’s way to “justify” not providing shuttles, language interpretation and accessibility ?? Sure seems that way. Where is the “community” side of this issue?
What I know is that:
1. Not everyone can access going online so it is NOT the best way to inform any community IF you want them to know of meetings (pretty sure the city officials know this).
2. City council meetings and agenda items are changed / rescheduled which is very confusing and without much notice.
3. Regarding the Belle Haven Community Campus, since it opened, there’s a disturbing record of negligence and failure towards community members’ crucial concerns of building safety and function, accessibility for seniors and those with disabilities, significant loss of valued classes and more –so, please continue to follow this… from the community members’ stand point please!
I appreciate Menlo Park’s stated goal—improving access to City Council meetings for Belle Haven residents and Spanish speakers. But the implementation so far has fallen short:
• The shuttle service from Belle Haven has only been offered sporadically—just three times since 2023—and even then was poorly used (two trips had zero riders, and only one served eight people). That hardly qualifies as consistent or reliable transportation support.
• Interpretation services require a 72 hour advance request online, yet City Manager staff only decide whether to schedule interpreters 48 hours before the meeting. That mismatch risks last minute denials and puts the burden on vulnerable residents to game the timing.
• Crucially, agendas are only published 48 hours before City Council meetings. That conflicts with standard expectations around equitable public notice (especially since some statutes require 72 hour posting) and disproportionately impacts individuals who need more time to plan or access translations.
Taken together, it feels like accessibility is being promised without the commitment to make it real—no budgeting, no consistency, no structural support. Especially when it comes to serving Belle Haven, the City’s approach feels like a performative gesture rather than genuine inclusion.
Like a Mexican saying goes, “Nos están dando atole con el dedo.” In other words, they’re offering empty gestures instead of real solutions.