|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Life in Silicon Valley is extraordinary, with 80% of the population in good health and average wages at $189,000 per year. Innovation is at a high, with 23,000 patents issued to inventors in the region, according to a new report. Market caps and private funding are off the charts.
Life in Silicon Valley is challenging. Housing remains among the costliest in the country, with 44% of renters being rent-burdened. Permits for low-income housing are lagging behind targets. And 410,000 area jobs involve tasks AI can now perform.
Data from the Silicon Valley Index, a highly regarded annual report composed by the think tank Joint Venture Silicon Valley, supports distinctly different stories about this region. Historically, rising inequality has helped drive social instability, Joint Venture Silicon Valley President and CEO Russell Hancock said during a recent call with reporters.
The growing gap between the rich and the poor is a theme that has been central to the Silicon Valley Index again and again and again. This year’s Index contains clues that the striking degree of inequality in Silicon Valley, paired with cultural factors such as ethnicity and tech skepticism, could contribute to populism, an ideology that pits the “corrupt elites” against the “pure” everyman.
“Not surprisingly, we have seen manifestations of populist fervor here, as in other parts of the country,” writes Hancock in the report’s introduction. “It’s being paired with a widespread distrust in tech, something unthinkable a generation ago.”
Rising inequality helps fuel populism, according to Stanford University scholar Francis Fukuyama, a senior fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies who also serves as the editor-in-chief of the online journal American Purpose.
“In general, I think that [populism] refers to people who believe that the world is controlled by elites, usually hidden in some way, that make the reality of power seem different from what it ostensibly is,” Fukuyama said in an interview.
While commentators and media frequently root the rise of populism in economic terms related to globalization or the decline of the middle class, Fukuyama noted that cultural fears about a nation’s identity or immigration can also contribute. Both of those factors could drive populism in a place like Silicon Valley.
“To the extent that you’ve got populism [in Silicon Valley], it’s a much more refined type,” Fukuyama said. “I think there certainly is resentment and class divisions, but they’re just not the sort that I think fit that early definition of populism.”
The road to instability
The Silicon Valley Index shows an extraordinary degree of wealth concentrated in the hands of a small group of people. According to the Index, the top 10% hold 75% of the wealth while the bottom half hold less than 1%. Additionally, there are 89 billionaires in Silicon Valley and 145,000 millionaires.
The income and wealth gaps in Silicon Valley are the starkest of anywhere on the planet, Hancock said in a reporter’s call on Feb. 25. Silicon Valley’s Gini coefficient, a common metric used to measure inequality, is 83, according to Hancock. A coefficient of 100 means that a single person owns all the wealth; a coefficient of 0 means that wealth is divided equally. Inequality in Silicon Valley, therefore, is markedly higher than the most unequal countries in the world, including South Africa, with a coefficient of 63, and Colombia, at 54.
“Most developmental economists… would tell you that 83 on the Gini is unstable – the conditions for revolt, the conditions for the French Revolution,” Hancock said.
The philanthropic sector is seeing a similar trend of consolidation. While the number of area nonprofits registered in Silicon Valley grew by 11%, just four charitable organizations drove 67% of total revenue. Employment, too, is concentrated among a relatively small number of firms. According to additional data compiled by Joint Venture, six firms – Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Cisco and Tesla – accounted for nearly a quarter of the area’s total in 2024.
The Index also shows evidence of consolidation in venture capital funding, sometimes called the “innovation engine” of Silicon Valley’s economy, even as investment activity grew. According to the Index, venture capital funding in Silicon Valley and San Francisco grew to $92 billion in 2025 – the second-highest amount of investment activity after 2021. That funding, however, is increasingly being awarded to a small number of firms. Megadeals – an investment of more than $100 million – accounted for more than half of venture capital investment activity in 2025, with much of that venture funding captured by AI funding.
“This, too, is a new development,” said Hancock in an interview with this publication. “In the past, we’ve been unconcentrated. The venture capital was spread more evenly and so was the wealth.”
By the end of 2025, Silicon Valley and San Francisco had 312 privately-held companies valued at more than $1 billion – known as “unicorns” – and 27 companies valued at $10 billion – known as “decacorns.” According to the Index, the number of unicorn companies has almost tripled in the last five years.
Most developmental economists… would tell you that 83 on the Gini is unstable – the conditions for revolt, the conditions for the French Revolution.
russell hancock, ceo of joint venture silicon valley
While investment growth is “white-hot”, said Hancock, that economic activity is not translating into job growth. Following a rebound in employment after the pandemic, Silicon Valley’s job growth has plateaued since 2022. According to the Index, the area has seen a modest reduction of about 13,100 jobs, or -0.8%, from mid-2024 to mid-2025.
The historic economic activity paired with flat employment is a key paradox of this year’s Silicon Valley Index. The artificial intelligence boom has led to ballooning private and public valuations in leading tech companies. It’s also resulted in layoffs at tech companies as tech companies adopt AI and jettison employees hired during the pandemic that companies say are no longer needed.
In the past few months, Amazon and Meta are among the firms that have announced layoffs at their facilities in Menlo Park, Palo Alto and East Palo Alto, according to WARN reports from the state Employment Development Department.
Amplifying some of these existing concerns are forecasts that artificial intelligence could eliminate thousands of jobs and cause unemployment to spike. For the first time in history, technological innovation could displace jobs among high income-earners rather than those in the bottom of the income distribution. According to an analysis in the Silicon Valley Index of jobs that are most exposed to automation, 410,000 align with tasks that AI can perform, mainly in the domains of image generating and language modeling.
“Silicon Valley used to create lots of opportunity along every rung of the income ladder, back in the old days,” Hancock said. “That’s no longer the case. …. The big structural change was that we just invented all of these tools, the Internet and other other tools, that made things unnecessary.”
Signs of discontent
These parallel but unequal realities are fueling populism, and the whispers of unease about the elites are growing steadily louder. A 2024 poll conducted by Joint Venture showed growing dissatisfaction about the contributions of technology companies. While 40% of residents said that they believe that the success of technology companies benefits everyone, 75% of respondents said that the leading tech companies have too much power and influence. In addition, 69% of respondents say that the leading tech companies have lost their moral compass.
That sentiment was on full display on Feb. 20, when U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna came to Stanford University to discuss AI and its impact on society. Sanders, a long-time critic of the billionaire class, earned rousing ovations from the crowd as he warned about the threats of AI. Khanna, for his part, criticized tech billionaires for believing that “they have a modern right to lead and rule,” according to prior coverage by this publication.
It’s not just progressive leaders who are questioning the new world order. Through claims of a “rigged system,” attacks on the “fake news media,” and the use of tariffs framed as protection for American workers, President Donald Trump and his allies have adopted an anti-establishment rhetoric that many experts consider populist. Fukuyama, for his part, considers Trump a “hypocritical populist,” noting that the main dimension that anchors Trump in the populist movement is resentment toward immigrants.
“He rhetorically says that he supports them, but he gets all this money from Silicon Valley oligarchs,” Fukuyama said. “And all of his friends are incredibly rich billionaires, and his tax policy is not redistributed.”
Still, in Silicon Valley, that rhetoric was far more appealing in cities with a large percentage of lower-income voters. According to an analysis by The Mercury News, support for Trump grew most dramatically in cities like East Palo Alto, Richmond, and San Pablo when comparing 2020 and 2024 election results. In East Palo Alto, the share of voters who supported Trump went up from 11.2% in 2020 to 19.1% in 2024. Across San Mateo County, which includes East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Woodside, Portola Valley and Atherton, 23% of the voters supported Trump in 2024, compared to 20.2% in 2020, election data shows.
In Santa Clara County, which includes Palo Alto and Mountain View, support for Trump went up from 25.2% in 2020 to 28.1% in 2024, according to election data.
Some people believe that Trump harnessed the economic anxieties of voters to gain power.
“Trump did not invent income inequality,” said David Waksberg, a member of the local grassroots organization Indivisible Palo Alto Plus, in an email. “He exploited it to gain power and point his finger at false ‘enemies’ and then, once in power, made it worse.”
Indivisible Palo Alto Plus, or IPA+, was created in 2024 amid concerns of democratic backsliding following the re-election of Donald Trump. The organization regularly plans events designed to protest a power structure that Waksberg says is run by autocrats and billionaires that are harming democracy. This has included local No Kings demonstrations, Billionaire Takedown protests, and a Tesla Takeover event that objected to Elon Musk’s role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) federal workforce reduction which cut around 60,000 federal jobs.
According to Waksberg, autocracy, corruption and income inequality are three mutually reinforcing sides of a triangle.
“The tech oligarchs are amassing wealth and power,” Waksberg said in an email. “IPA+ seeks to expose these dichotomies as well as fight against the “surveillance state” which is enriching the owners of companies like Palantir and Flock at the expense of our privacy and security.”
Distrust of tech only started for all of these O.W.L.s in November 2024. Choke on it.