|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The last time the U.S. men’s national soccer team played a World Cup knock-out game on American soil, it suffered a heartbreaking loss to Brazil, the team that would go on to lift the 1994 FIFA World Cup trophy.
The 1-0 match was played at the Stanford Stadium on July 4, 1994. The stadium hosted five other matches during the World Cup, with over half a million soccer fans flocking to Stanford for four group stage games and two knock-out games in June and July of 1994.
The 1994 World Cup was a test of whether Americans would ever embrace soccer. Thirty-two years later, the explosive excitement over this year’s World Cup, hosted jointly in the United States, Canada and Mexico, has brought new questions about commercialization and rising ticket prices.
Ray Purpur, who has served as Stanford’s assistant or deputy athletic director since 1994, was the stadium manager during the 1994 tournament. He oversaw a team of Stanford personnel that ran tickets, concessions, groundskeeping, game-day set-up and a media relations tent.
One of the key differences Purpur can recall from the 1994 games is a significant jump in ticket prices.
“I remember the ticket pricing was expensive, but it’s nothing like today,” Purpur said. “A regular family that worked hard could go to the World Cup game back then.”
World Cup fans have been outraged by ticket prices that are the most expensive in the tournament’s history and by a purchasing process that many found opaque, glitchy and difficult. FIFA, the tournament’s organizer and the international governing body of soccer, has also used the controversial dynamic pricing mechanism that adjusts ticket prices in real-time for games with higher demand.
FIFA has defended the price policies by saying that the higher prices reflect the North American ticket market, where fans often pay hundreds of dollars for sporting events. It has also said that the revenue from the tournament will be re-invested back into soccer.
Tickets for the U.S. team’s first knock-out match of this year’s World Cup, scheduled at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara on July 1, have already sold out on FIFA’s official resale marketplace. The cheapest resale ticket prices on websites like StubHub and TicketMaster start at around $2,500 for seats in the upper levels; lower-level tickets are selling for more than $10,000. In 1994, tickets ranged from $25 for the cheapest group-stage games to $475 for a ticket to the final, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Prior to the 1994 tournament, a local organizing committee secured the bid for four group stage games and two knock-out games to be played at Stanford’s football stadium. At the time, the stadium could accommodate 85,000 fans but had very little premium seating, Purpur said. There was minimal shade, and the fans suffered in the heat. The Palo Alto Police and Fire departments provided their services to ensure a safe game day.
“There were a lot of people from all over the world, speaking different languages, wearing different kinds of outfits,” Purpur said. “[But] I don’t think it’s anything like it is today, in terms of the scale of the festivities.”
The Palo Alto Weekly’s archives reported that area festivities included a party tent at the Holiday Inn with “24 days of continuous coverage,” a Brazilian Jazz night at the Stanford Shopping Center and a free soccer clinic hosted by the Silicon Valley Firebirds.
At the Stanford World Cup matches, fans watched Brazil beat Russia and Cameroon in two group stage games. Later, the U.S. men’s national team fell to Romania 1-0 in a group stage game. The knock-out games included the U.S. loss to Brazil and Sweden’s defeat of Romania in penalty kicks in the quarterfinals in the final game played at Stanford on July 10.
“The highlight of the three weeks of the World Cup locally was undoubtedly the festive Brazilians, who arrived at their three Stanford games early, danced outside the stadium, and made a lot of noise but created no problems for the police,” the Palo Alto Weekly reported on July 13, 1994. “The only incident that marred the day occurred long after the game, when a dozen boisterous Swedes delayed the departure of a CalTrain run for half an hour at 11 p.m.”
The football field at Stanford Stadium was too narrow to accommodate a regulation soccer pitch, so organizers expanded the playing surface into the stadium’s nine-lane track. Trays of grass were installed around the existing field, creating enough space for the matches, Purpur said.
Fans could buy concessions during the games, but one staple of modern sporting events was missing: alcohol. Stanford did not sell alcoholic beverages at athletic events at the time, so the university’s World Cup matches — the biggest sporting events in the world — were played without beer in the stands.
Purpur recalled that several heads of state from other countries attended the games, but the security was relaxed compared to today’s standards.
“It wasn’t like it would be today,” Purpur said. “I just remember them pulling right in. There were some cones that we pulled out and he got out and went to the party.”
The 1994 World Cup is widely viewed as a transformative moment for American soccer. More people -— 3.6 million total spectators — attended than at any previous tournament. It also paved the way for the U.S. Major Soccer League, which now has 30 professional soccer teams.
The tournament also left a local legacy. The Palo Alto Weekly reported in July 1994 that the World Cup games helped make soccer “as acceptable as baseball, basketball and football.”
“The World Cup has legitimized it – among their peers – that soccer’s cool. It’s OK to play it instead of baseball,” Gary Fine, a Palo Alto youth soccer coach, told the Weekly at the time.
In the years that followed, Stanford’s soccer program emerged as a premier destination for elite players, developing talent that went on to compete for both the U.S. men’s and women’s national teams.
“It felt like it was a little bit of the turning point for soccer [at Stanford],” Purpur said. “We started selling season tickets, we started winning… there was definitely momentum coming off the games.”
